+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy



Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy



American Journal of Transplantation 2(10): 983-988



The benefits of laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (LDN) are well described, while similar data on hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (HALDN) are lacking. We compare hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy with open donor nephrectomy. One hundred consecutive hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (10/98-8/01) donor/recipient pairs were compared to 50 open donor nephrectomy pairs (8/97-1/00). Mean donor weights were similar (179.6 +/- 40.8 vs. 167.4 +/- 30.3 lb; p = NS), while donor age was greater among hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (38.2 +/- 9.5 vs. 31.2 +/- 7.8 year; p < 0.01). Right nephrectomies was fewer in hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy [17/100 (17%) vs. 22/50 (44%); p < 0.05]. Operative time for hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (3.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.5 h; p < 0.01) was longer; however, return to diet (6.9 +/- 2.8 vs. 25.6 +/- 6.1 h; p < 0.01), narcotics requirement (17.9 +/- 6.3 vs. 56.3 +/- 6.4h; p < 0.01) and length of stay (51.7 +/- 22.2 vs. 129.6 +/- 65.7 h; p < 0.01) were less than open donor nephrectomy. Costs were similar ($11072 vs. 10840). Graft function and 1-week Cr of 1.4 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.1 g/dL (p = NS) were similar. With the introduction of HALDN, our laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy program has increased by 20%. Thus, similar to traditional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy provides advantages over open donor nephrectomy without increasing costs.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046211049

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12482153

DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.21017.x


Related references

Safety and Efficacy of Retroperitoneoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Comparison of Early Complication, Donor and Recipient Outcome with Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy. Journal of Endourology 2018, 2018

Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy compared to the hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. World Journal of Urology 20(6): 356-359, 2003

Single-center analysis of living donor nephrectomy: hand-assisted laparoscopic, pure laparoscopic, and traditional open. Progress in Transplantation 12(3): 206-211, 2002

Single-Center Analysis of Living Donor Nephrectomy: Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic, Pure Laparoscopic, and Traditional Open. Progress in Transplantation 12(3): 208-211, 2002

Early and late graft function after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy for living kidney transplantation: comparison with open donor nephrectomy. Urologia Internationalis 84(1): 61-66, 2010

A randomized clinical trial of living donor nephrectomy: a plea for a differentiated appraisal of mini-open muscle splitting incision and hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transplant International 25(9): 976-986, 2013

Renal vein extension during living-donor kidney transplantation in the era of hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 99(4): 786-790, 2015

Single-site laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy offers comparable perioperative outcomes to conventional laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy at a higher cost. Transplantation 91(2): E16-E17, 2011

Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy superior to laparoscopic nephrectomy. Transplantation Proceedings 35(2): 782-783, 2003

Results and surgical complications of living donor nephrectomy: open vs hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. Progres en Urologie 19(6): 389-394, 2009

Should hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy replace the standard laparoscopic technique for living donor nephrectomy? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery 40: 83-90, 2017

Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in comparison with standard laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. European Urology Suppl.s 16(3): E1755-E1756, 2017

Transperitoneal deviceless hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: an alternative technique for kidney recovery. Journal of Endourology 24(10): 1617-1623, 2011

Donor complications following laparoscopic compared to hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: an analysis of the literature. Journal of Transplantation 2010: 825689, 2010

Impact of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy on donor's quality of life, emotional, and social state. Transplantation Proceedings 42(5): 1487-1491, 2010