+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison with transabdominal radical nephrectomy



Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison with transabdominal radical nephrectomy



American Surgeon 68(2): 151-153



The purpose of this study was to investigate whether hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALN) has benefits over the traditional transabdominal radical nephrectomy. More specifically we focused on the use of the hand-assisted technique as a definitive oncologic procedure for renal cancers. This study is a retrospective nonrandomized study comparing 12 hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomies with 12 transabdominal radical nephrectomies. All patients included in the study had the preoperative diagnosis of renal mass. HALN population averaged 1.83 +/- 1.64 (mean +/- standard deviation) major comorbidities versus 1.08 +/- 0.8 open (P = 0.032). The HALN OR time averaged 103 +/- 32.8 versus 57 +/- 18.3 minutes open (P = 0.001). The estimated blood loss mean for HALN was 83 versus 318 cm3 open (P = 0.001). Length of stay for HALN was 4.9 +/- 2.2 versus 5.9 +/- 2.9 days (P = 0.35). Days to regular diet was 2.9 +/- 2.3 in HALN versus 3.5 +/- 2.11 open (P = 0.52). Days of intravenous pain medications were 1.8 +/- 0.72 HALN versus 3.0 +/- 1.28 open (P = 0.016). Postoperative complication rates for the two groups were identical: two of 12 (ileus and post-operative bleeding). Tumor size mean was 6.8 +/- 2.99 cm for HALN versus 4.2 +/- 1.29 cm open (P = 0.012). Tumor margins were negative for 12 of 12 in HALN versus 11 of 12 open. Selection bias (selecting ailing patients to the HALN cohort) diminished the statistical significance of our postoperative recovery data. It is likely that a prospectively randomized study with a larger population may prove the hand-assisted approach equal if not superior to the open technique. The use of HALN in patients with renal tumors is an effective alternative to traditional transabdominal radical nephrectomy.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046211062

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11842961


Related references

Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy Comparison to open radical nephrectomy Reply by the authors. Urology 59(4): 633, April, 2002

Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison with conventional open radical nephrectomy. Journal of Endourology 21(4): 429-432, 2007

Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison to open radical nephrectomy. Urology 58(4): 517-520, October, 2001

Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison with open radical nephrectomy. Journal of Urology 170(3): 756-759, 2003

Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with open radical nephrectomy for pT1-2 clear cell renal-cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Journal of Endourology 23(9): 1485-1489, 2009

Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal masses >9.5 cm: series comparison with open radical nephrectomy. Urologic Oncology 23(5): 323-327, 2005

Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy vs. open nephrectomy in the treatment of clinically localized renal cell carcinoma. Comparative study. Archivos Espanoles de Urologia 57(8): 833-837, 2004

Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 70(5): 873-877, 2007

Cost comparison of standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Journal of Urology 169(4 Supplement): 13, April, 2003

Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 15(4): 216-219, 2005

Concomitant laparoscopic hand-assisted radical nephrectomy and open radical prostatectomy using a single lower midline incision. Urology 56(6): 1056-1056, 2000

Comparison of standard and hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 98(11): 389-396, 2008

Comparison of standard and hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Fukuoka Acta Medica 98(11): 389-396, 2007

Re: comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy with conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal-cell carcinoma. Journal of Urology 185(1): 97-98, 2016

Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy with conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal-cell carcinoma. Journal of Endourology 24(6): 997-1003, 2010