+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Handheld computers in critical care

Handheld computers in critical care

Critical Care 5(4): 227-231

Computing technology has the potential to improve health care management but is often underutilized. Handheld computers are versatile and relatively inexpensive, bringing the benefits of computers to the bedside. We evaluated the role of this technology for managing patient data and accessing medical reference information, in an academic intensive-care unit (ICU). Palm III series handheld devices were given to the ICU team, each installed with medical reference information, schedules, and contact numbers. Users underwent a 1-hour training session introducing the hardware and software. Various patient data management applications were assessed during the study period. Qualitative assessment of the benefits, drawbacks, and suggestions was performed by an independent company, using focus groups. An objective comparison between a paper and electronic handheld textbook was achieved using clinical scenario tests. During the 6-month study period, the 20 physicians and 6 paramedical staff who used the handheld devices found them convenient and functional but suggested more comprehensive training and improved search facilities. Comparison of the handheld computer with the conventional paper text revealed equivalence. Access to computerized patient information improved communication, particularly with regard to long-stay patients, but changes to the software and the process were suggested. The introduction of this technology was well received despite differences in users' familiarity with the devices. Handheld computers have potential in the ICU, but systems need to be developed specifically for the critical-care environment.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046211266

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11511337

DOI: 10.1186/cc1028

Related references

Critical care procedure logging using handheld computers. Critical Care 8(5): R336-R342, 2004

Introducing handheld computers into home care. Canadian Nurse 108(1): 28-32, 2012

Can handheld computers improve the quality of care?. Lancet 358(9291): 1438-1438, 2001

Development of a system to evaluate preventive care using handheld computers as a research tool. Pediatric Research 53(4 Part 2): 220A, April, 2003

Using wireless handheld computers to seek information at the point of care: an evaluation by clinicians. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(6): 807-815, 2007

Evidence of effectiveness of health care professionals using handheld computers: a scoping review of systematic reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15(10): E212-E212, 2014

Equipping primary care physicians for the digital age. The Internet, online education, handheld computers, and telemedicine. Western Journal of Medicine 176(2): 116-120, 2002

Improving Patient Health Outcomes in Acute Care Hospital Units Using Mobile Wireless Technology and Handheld Computers. Cin Computers Informatics Nursing 25(5): 308-309, 2007

Implementation of a handheld electronic point-of-care billing system improved efficiency in the critical care unit. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 22(6): 374-380, 2007

Use of handheld devices in critical care. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America 17(1): 45-50, X, 2005

The handheld computer in critical care medicine. American Surgeon 52(8): 452-455, 1986

Multicenter study of oxygen-insensitive handheld glucose point-of-care testing in critical care/hospital/ambulatory patients in the United States and Canada. Critical Care Medicine 26(3): 581-590, 1998

Assessing the performance of handheld glucose testing for critical care. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 10(6): 445-451, 2008

Computers in critical care. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America 7(2): 203-217, 1995

Computers for critical care. Heart & Lung 12(1): 105-106, 1983