+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Handicap discrimination law: what does the statute imply?

Handicap discrimination law: what does the statute imply?

Hospital Progress 62(1): 56-59

Sections 503 and 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act are at issue in various recent court actions. More litigation is to be expected in defining a "qualified handicapped individual" and in determining whether the statute implies private right of action for employment discrimination.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046211288

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10317040

Related references

Legal changes in rehabilitation law- medical rehabilitation-by the Expenditure-reducing Supplemental statute, the Work promoting Consolidating statute and by the Second Budget Structure statute of 1. January 1982. Die Rehabilitation 21(1): 32-33, 1982

Dentists' liability for handicap discrimination against AIDS patients. Journal of the Colorado Dental Association 66(4): 8-9, 1988

Lack of insurance coverage for prescription contraception by an otherwise comprehensive plan as a violation of Title VII as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act--stretching the statute too far. Indiana Law Review 37(2): 437-466, 2005

Handicap et ecarts salariaux en Europe discrimination ou moindre productivite?. 2012

AIDS in the workplace. Handicap discrimination laws and related statutes. Journal of Legal Medicine 9(4): 573-585, 1988

Mental illness, handicap and the introduction of legal positive discrimination in France. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 33(2): 144-148, 1987

Metacognition does not imply self-reflection, but it does imply function. Journal of Comparative Psychology 128(2): 150-1; Discussion 160-2, 2015

Handicap discrimination considerations in treating the impaired worker: drugs, alcohol, pregnancy, and AIDS in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Medicine. 30(4): 321-327, 1988

AIDS--ADA--handicap discrimination--ERISA plan--preemption. McNeil v. Time Insurance Company, 205 F.3d 179 (5th Cir. 2000). Benefits Quarterly 17(3): 66-67, 2001

"Knickel" and dime issues: an unexplored loophole in New York's genetic discrimination statute and the viability of genetic testing in the sports employment context. Albany Law Review 70(2): 771-793, 2007

What is "safe" about the government's recent interpretation of the anti-kickback statute safe harbors? ... and since when was Stark an intent-based statute?. Journal of Health Law 36(4): 549-576, 2004

Medical malpractice statute of limitations. Statute of limitations does not start to run until patient learns of negligent act. Phillips v The Regents of the University of California, No G039833 (Ct. App. Calif. May 13, 2009). Journal of Healthcare Risk Management 29(2): 34-35, 2009

AIDS and employment discrimination: should AIDS be considered a handicap?. Wayne Law Review 33(3): 1095-1110, 1987

Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Quality in Health Care 3(1): 11-16, 1994

Modeles de representations du handicap et leur impact sur les droits des personnes en situation de handicap. 2012