+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Hanlester Laboratories decision: important test of antikickback statute



Hanlester Laboratories decision: important test of antikickback statute



Healthspan 8(4): 9-12




(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046211742

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10110667


Related references

Hanlester Laboratories decision gives dangerously broad interpretation of federal anti-kickback statute. Healthspan 9(6): 11-14, 1992

The problem of physician self-referral under the Medicare and Medicaid antikickback statute. The Hanlester Network case and the safe harbor regulation. JAMA 268(1): 85-91, 1992

Ninth Circuit Hanlester decision adds another twist to anti-kickback statute. Georgia Hospitals Today 39(5): 3-3, 1995

Hanlester Laboratories decision: how is it affected by new sanctions and penalties regulations?. Healthspan 9(3): 13-20, 1992

New test? Hanlester decision clamps down on MD ventures. Hospitals 66(14): 24, 26-24, 26, 1992

Pharmacists, Medicare Part D, and the antikickback statute. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 63(15): 1435-1437, 2006

HHS' inspector general warns providers about joint ventures. With sham deals increasing, office cautions that suspicious cases may trigger antikickback statute. Modern Healthcare 33(17): 8-9, 2003

"Hanlester Laboratories": HHS joint venture standards remain unclear. Healthspan 8(10): 8-11, 1991

Florida Fourth District Court of Appeals rejects Hanlester v. Shalala and finds commission-based marketing contract violative of the Federal Medicare Anti-Kickback Statute. Bender's Health Care Law Monthly: 8-9, 1996

Third decision in the Hanlester Case creates further uncertainty. Health Systems Review 25(3): 42-44, 1992

The Hanlester decision: intent is significant in anti-kickback law analysis. Wisconsin Medical Journal 94(11): 633-635, 1995

The Hanlester Appeal: the latest decision regarding physician self-referral joint ventures. Journal of Cardiovascular Management 6(4): 16, 18-20, 1995

Departmental appeals board issues final decision in Hanlester Network case. Health Care Law Newsletter 7(11): 11-14, 1992

Statute of medical analysis laboratories; non-status director. Produits Pharmaceutiques 13(7): 369-369, 1958

Legal changes in rehabilitation law- medical rehabilitation-by the Expenditure-reducing Supplemental statute, the Work promoting Consolidating statute and by the Second Budget Structure statute of 1. January 1982. Die Rehabilitation 21(1): 32-33, 1982