+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Hospitals' direct liability for medical malpractice--implications for the medical staff



Hospitals' direct liability for medical malpractice--implications for the medical staff



Medical Staff Counselor 3(1): 25-34



Historically, hospital liability for the wrongful acts of physicians was based on the doctrine of vicarious liability-i.e., the physician was regarded as an employee or agent of the hospital. With the courts' growing recognition of most physicians as independent contractors, the doctrine of corporate or direct liability has emerged as the primary basis upon which courts now hold hospitals liable for failing to adequately monitor and control the standards of medical care and treatment offered within their walls. This article discusses eleven theories for imposing direct liability on hospitals and considers their impact on hospital-physician relations.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046274553

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10291135


Related references

Medical history studies on the problem of medical malpractice and medical liability. A 19th century medical law regulating medical liability questions. Gesnerus 43(1-2): 61-83, 1986

The legal liability of doctors and hospitals for medical malpractice. South African Medical Journal 80(1): 23-27, 1991

Hospital liability in malpractice cases for negligence in the granting and renewal of medical staff membership and clinical privileges. Connecticut Medicine 50(8): 519-520, 1986

The implications of practice guidelines for physician medical malpractice liability. Physician Executive 20(5): 20-21, 1994

What we can learn from a case of medical malpractice-substantial awards affirmed in medical malpractice case for death after caesarean section from delayed detection of intraperitoneal hemorrhage; in contrast to damages awarded for a motor vehicle accident, damages for medical accidents was estimated to be higher in this case on the basis of a decision on liability in claimant's favor. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 115(6): 343-344, 2015

Managing medical staff disability issues: liability of private hospitals under ADA Titles I and III. Journal of Health Law 34(1): 67-103, 2001

Largest professional liability carriers. Ranked by U.S. direct medical malpractice premiums written in 2008. Modern Healthcare 39(51): 33-33, 2010

The Nebraska Hospital-Medical Liability Act: a successful approach to medical malpractice caps. Nebraska Medical Journal 79(10): 344-7; Discussion 348, 1994

Judicial or administrative settlement of medical malpractice claims. Update on medical liability. Medecine Tropicale 72 Spec No: 105-110, 2012

Conflict of liability for medical malpractice and legal obligation for economic medical treatment. Laryngo- Rhino- Otologie 86(4): 296-298, 2007

Therapeutic hazard: round-table discussion about medical liability without malpractice? Medical responsility. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthetique 45(2): 143-145, 2000

Quality of medical care and patient surgical safety: medical error, malpractice and professional liability. Cirugia Y Cirujanos 78(5): 456-462, 2011

The frequency of medical malpractice: the results of the German Expert Panels and Arbitration Boards for Medical Liability. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen 102(9): 525-8; Discussion 545, 606-8, 2009

Medical liability and the law. Part I: Medical malpractice and the configuration of guilt. Revista Medica de Chile 108(8): 735-743, 1980

Experiences of medical professional liability insurers with medical malpractice. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen 102(9): 542-5; Discussion 545, 606-8, 2009