+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Host range and local parasite adaptation

Host range and local parasite adaptation

Proceedings. Biological Sciences 269(1492): 703-710

Parasites may be expected to become locally adapted to their hosts. However, while many empirical studies have demonstrated local parasite adaptation, others have failed to demonstrate it, or have shown local parasite maladaptation. Researchers have suggested that gene flow can swamp local parasite-host dynamics and produce local adaptation only at certain geographical scales; others have argued that evolutionary lags can account for both null and maladaptive results. In this paper, we use item response theory (IRT) to test whether host range influences the likelihood of parasites locally adapting to their hosts. We collated 32 independent experiments testing for local adaptation, where parasites could be assigned as having either broad or narrow host ranges (BHR and NHR, respectively). Twenty-five tests based on BHR parasites had a significantly lower average effect size than seven NHR tests, indicating that studies based on BHR parasites are less likely to demonstrate local parasite adaptation. We argue that this may relate to evolutionary lags during diffuse coevolution of BHR parasites with their hosts, rather than differences in experimental approaches or other confounds between BHR and NHR studies.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046274882

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11934361

DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1943

Related references

Host Range and Local Parasite Adaptation. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 269(1492): 703-710, 2002

Parasite dose, prevalence of infection and local adaptation in a host-parasite system. Parasitology 128(Pt 2): 223-228, 2004

Host-parasite local adaptation. 2011

Local adaptation and host-parasite interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13(6): 214-216, 1998

Local adaptation in host-parasite systems. Heredity 81(4): 361-370, 1998

Local adaptation and the geometry of host-parasite coevolution. Ecology Letters ch; 5(2): 246-256, 2002

Patterns of local adaptation of a protozoan parasite to its bumblebee host. Oikos 82(1): 59-65, 1998

Clinal variation for local adaptation in a host-parasite interaction. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of London Series B Biological Sciences. 263(1372): 891-897, 1996

Host diversity limits the evolution of parasite local adaptation. Molecular Ecology 26(7): 1756-1763, 2016

The effect of migration on local adaptation in a coevolving host-parasite system. Nature London 437(7056): 253-256, 2005

Habitat Heterogeneity, Host Population Structure, and Parasite Local Adaptation. Journal of Heredity 109(1): 29-37, 2017

On the equivalence of host local adaptation and parasite maladaptation: an experimental test. American Naturalist 179(2): 270-281, 2012

Host propagation permits extreme local adaptation in a social parasite of ants. Ecology Letters 9(9): 1032-1040, 2006

Local adaptation in a crustacean parasite-molluscan host interaction: a field experiment. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7(8): 1191-1199, 2005

Testing for local host-parasite adaptation: an experiment with Gyrodactylus ectoparasites and guppy hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 45(6): 409-417, 2016