+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

How much does a shared name make things similar? Linguistic labels, similarity, and the development of inductive inference



How much does a shared name make things similar? Linguistic labels, similarity, and the development of inductive inference



Child Development 72(6): 1695-1709



This article examines the development of inductive generalization, and presents a model of young children's induction and two experiments testing the model. The model specifies contribution of linguistic labels and perceptual similarity to young children's induction and predicts a correspondence between similarity judgment and induction of young children. In Experiment 1, 4- to 5-year-olds, 7- to 8-year-olds, and 11- to 12-year-olds were presented with triads of schematic faces (a Target and two Test stimuli), which varied in perceptual similarity, with one of the Test stimuli sharing a linguistic label with the Target, and another having a different label. Participants were taught an unobservable biological property about the Target and asked to generalize the property to one of the Test stimuli. Although 4- to 5-year-olds' proportions of label-based inductive generalizations varied with the degree of perceptual similarity among the compared stimuli, 11- to 12-year-olds relied exclusively on labels, and 7- to 8-year-olds appeared to be a transitional group. In Experiment 2 these findings were replicated using naturalistic stimuli (i.e., photographs of animals), with perceptual similarity manipulated by "morphing" naturalistic pictures into each other in a fixed number of steps. Overall results support predictions of the model and point to a developmental shift from treating linguistic labels as an attribute contributing to similarity to treating them as markers of a common category-a shift that appears to occur between 8 and 11 years of age.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046280134

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11768140


Related references

How much does a shared name make things similar? Part 1. Linguistic labels and the development of similarity judgment. Developmental Psychology 35(6): 1478-1492, 1999

Thirteen-month-olds rely on shared labels and shape similarity for inductive inferences. Child Development 75(2): 409-427, 2004

The influence of shape similarity and shared labels on infants' inductive inferences about nonobvious object properties. Child Development 72(6): 1653-1673, 2002

The role of linguistic labels in inductive generalization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114(3): 432-455, 2013

Semantic similarity of labels and inductive generalization: taking a second look. Cognition 118(3): 432-438, 2013

Distinct labels attenuate 15-month-olds' attention to shape in an inductive inference task. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 586-586, 2013

Preschool children's use of trait labels to make inductive inferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 77(1): 1-19, 2000

Carrot eaters or moving heads: inductive inference is better supported by salient features than by category labels. Psychological Science 23(2): 178-186, 2012

The effect of perceptual similarity and linguistic input on children's acquisition of object labels. Journal of Child Language 24(3): 695-717, 1998

To make right things or to make things right? Difficult balancing of clinical audit of psychiatric care. Lakartidningen 96(6): 610-612, 1999

Inductive inference or inductive behavior: Fisher and Neyman-Pearson approaches to statistical testing in psychological research (1940-1960). American Journal of Psychology 119(4): 625-653, 2007

To make things correctly, and to make the correct things. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 116(17): 1989-1989, 1996

Ribozymes: catalytic RNAs that cut things, make things, and do odd and useful jobs. Biologist 49(5): 199-203, 2002

Effects of categorical labels on similarity judgments: a critical analysis of similarity-based approaches. Developmental Psychology 48(3): 890-896, 2012

The way I see it: things may go better with COLA, but let's just make things equitable. Canadian Medical Association Journal 112(10): 1224-1224, 1975