+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

How practice patterns in colon cancer patient follow-up are affected by surgeon age



How practice patterns in colon cancer patient follow-up are affected by surgeon age



Surgical Oncology 5(3): 127-131



Strategies for the follow-up of colon cancer patients after potentially curative treatment are known to vary widely. The optimal regimen remains unknown. We investigated whether the date of completion of formal surgical training affects choice of surveillance strategy. The 1070 members of the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) and the 1663 members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) were surveyed using a detailed questionnaire to measure how these surgical experts deal with colon cancer follow-up. Subjects were asked how they use nine specific follow-up modalities during years 1-5 following primary treatment for patients with colon cancer (TNM Stages I-III). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare practice patterns by TNM stage and year post-surgery, as well as by the year in which the surgeon's formal surgery training was completed. Evaluable responses were received from 349 SSO members (33%) and 646 ASCRS members (39%). Few significant differences in follow-up practices were noted by training period, but follow-up for most of the nine modalities was highly correlated with TNM stage and year post-surgery, as expected. This analysis indicates that the post-treatment surveillance practice patterns of surgeons caring for patients with colon cancer do not vary substantially with practitioner age. The data provide credible evidence that postgraduate education is effective in homogenizing practitioner behaviour.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046280794

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 8908718

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-7404(96)80012-0


Related references

Practice patterns in colon cancer patient follow-up are minimally affected by surgeon age Evidence that post-residency education is effective in modifying physician behavior. Gastroenterology 110(4 SUPPL ): A21, 1996

How practice patterns in lung cancer patient follow-up are affected by surgeon age. Oncology Reports 3(5): 851-855, 1996

Practice patterns in rectal cancer patient follow-up are unaffected by surgeon age. Journal of Cancer Education 23(4): 248-252, 2008

The effect of the surgeon and the pathologist on patient survival after resection of colon and rectal cancer. Annals of Surgery 235(4): 464-465, 2002

The "cured" lung cancer patient: is follow-up by the surgeon worthwhile?. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 60(6): 1557-1558, 1995

Variation in lymph node assessment after colon cancer resection: patient, surgeon, pathologist, or hospital?. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 15(3): 471-479, 2011

Impact of patient age and comorbidity on surgeon versus oncologist preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 208(2): 202-209, 2009

Should the surgeon or the general practitioner (GP) follow up patients after surgery for colon cancer? A randomized controlled trial protocol focusing on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and serious clinical events. Bmc Health Services Research 8(): 137-137, 2008

Impact of breast cancer treatment guidelines on surgeon practice patterns: results of a hospital-based intervention. Surgery 128(5): 847-861, 2000

Practice parameters for the surveillance and follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 47(6): 807-817, 2004

Learning curves in laparoscopic right-sided colon cancer surgery: a comparison of first-generation colorectal surgeon to advance laparoscopically trained surgeon. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A 21(9): 789-796, 2012

Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology 24 Suppl 6: Vi64-Vi72, 2014

Primary colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology 21 Suppl 5: V70-V77, 2010

General practice vs surgical-based follow-up for patients with colon cancer: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Cancer 94(8): 1116-1121, 2006

Surveillance after curative colon cancer resection: practice patterns of surgical subspecialists. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2(6): 472-482, 1995