+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

How reliable are peer reviews in research fund applications?



How reliable are peer reviews in research fund applications?



Ugeskrift for Laeger 160(47): 6827-6828




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046280954

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9835794


Related references

Virtual and Peer Reviews of Grant Applications at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Southern Medical Journal 108(10): 622-626, 2016

Global Fund reviews grant applications. Aids Policy & Law 17(6): 1, 6-1, 6, 2002

Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews. Plos One 6(11): E27557-E27557, 2012

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study. BMJ Open 5(7): E008380-E008380, 2016

Academic freedom and peer reviews of research proposals and papers. American journal of agricultural economics: 639-646, 1980

Peer-reviewed research funded by the Louisiana Cancer and Lung Trust Fund Board. Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society 143(4): 25-26, 1991

Reliable change assessment in sport concussion research: a comment on the proposal and reviews of Collie et al. British Journal of Sports Medicine 39(8): 483-7; Discussion 487-8, 2005

An efficient system to fund science: from proposal review to peer-to-peer distributions. Scientometrics 110(1): 521-528, 2017

Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews. Conservation Biology 29(6): 1596-1605, 2015

Physiatry Reviews for Evidence in Practice (PREP), Second-Order Peer Reviews of Clinically Relevant Articles for the Physiatrist. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 94(10): 820-822, 2016

Quality assurance reviews: how they differ from peer reviews. Quality Assurance 6(2): 75-85, 1999

Danish Council of Nurses invites applications for research fund. Sygeplejersken 86(6): 27-27, 1986

Danish Nursing Council invites applications to research fund. Sygeplejersken 86(33): 21-21, 1986

Publishing a Peer-Reviewed Journal Without Peer Reviews. Journal of Food Science 82(8): 1783-1783, 2017

Peer-to Peer Hospital Reviews Helpful but Difficult. Hospital Peer Review 42(6): 61-63, 2018