+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

How reliable is the predictive value of SEP (somatosensory evoked potentials) patterns in severe brain damage with special regard to the bilateral loss of cortical responses?

How reliable is the predictive value of SEP (somatosensory evoked potentials) patterns in severe brain damage with special regard to the bilateral loss of cortical responses?

Intensive Care Medicine 23(3): 301-308

In patients sustaining severe brain damage (SBD), prediction of later outcome is often very difficult, in particular under conditions of therapeutic management like relaxation and intravenous phenobarbital. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) correlated best with later prognosis and expected neurological deficit. In detail, the primary bilateral loss of cortical responses (BLCR) is regarded to be a reliable marker for poor prognosis. The goal of the following prospective study was to reassess the prognostic value of early serial median nerve SEP recording in severe brain damage in comparison to other neurophysiological, clinical, and neuroradiological parameters and, additionally, to test the hypothesis, that the BLCR-pattern is always associated with a poor prognosis and is never reversible. Prospective study. Anaesthesiological hospital intensive care unit. 42 comatose patients with severe brain damage (29 males/13 females), mean age 39.6 +/- 19.3 years, mean initial Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) 6.6 +/- 3.1, investigated by means of median somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) with serial recordings on day 1, 3 to 4, and 8 to 1, and repeated cranial computerized tomography. We classified the outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Our data showed a high correlation of initial SEP scores (Spearman correlation coefficient = -0.70) with outcome for both a favorable and an unfavorable prognosis (p = 0.0001). The reliability increased with serial recordings. The SEPs showed superiority to parallel brainstem auditory evoked potentials (Spearman correlation coefficient = -0.50, p = 0.0007), GCS, and standardized neuroradiological criteria. Primary (BLCR) occurred in 16 patients (38%) and implied a fatal prognosis in all adult patients (n = 15, specificity = 93.3%, sensitivity = 59.3%). In contrast, a young child with predominant brainstem hemorrhagic contusions regained consciousness and developed mild to moderate neurological deficit (GOS 3-4) during long-term follow-up of 4 years. This clinical improvement paralleled bilateral asymmetric recovery of cortical SEP responses. SEP allow an early reliable assessment of both poor and good prognosis in SBD, in particular when applied serially. BLCR does not always imply a fatal diagnosis, as a circumscribed contusional lesion rarely may lead to selective reversible blockage of ascending somatosensory pathways in the brainstem. In contradiction to this lesional etiology, a hypoxia-induced BLCR pattern seems to correlate strictly with a poor prognosis, reflecting a different pathogenesis with diffuse destruction of cortex and thalamocortical pathways.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046280978

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9083233

DOI: 10.1007/s001340050332

Related references

Positive predictive value of bilateral absence of somatosensory evoked potentials in severe traumatic brain injury. Pediatric Research 43(4 Part 2): 33A, 1998

Median-evoked somatosensory potentials in severe brain injury: does initial loss of cortical potentials exclude recovery?. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 123: 25-33, 2014

Neurological outcome in comatose children with bilateral loss of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials. Neuropediatrics 32(5): 271-274, 2001

Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery 61(Suppl. 1): 171-174, 2014

Predictive value of neurological examination for early cortical responses to somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with postanoxic coma. Journal of Neurology 259(3): 537-541, 2012

Somatosensory evoked potentials recorded post coma in severe brain damage. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 24(1-2): 1128, 1998

Preserved cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in apnoeic coma with loss of brain-stem reflexes. Journal of Neurology 241(5): 350-351, 1994

Somatosensory evoked potentials following severe head injury: loss of the thalamic potential with brain death. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 87(2-3): 255-264, 1988

Preserved cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in apnoeic coma with loss of brain-stem reflexes: Case report. Journal of Neurology 240(4): 243-246, 1993

Favourable outcome of a brain trauma patient despite bilateral loss of cortical somatosensory evoked potential during thiopental sedation. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 74(8): 1157-1158, 2003

The effect of spasticity on cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials: changes of cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials after botulinum toxin type A injection. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 83(11): 1592-1596, 2002

Early and middle latency auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials in the vital and functional prognosis of severe brain injuries in intensive care. Agressologie: Revue Internationale de Physio-Biologie et de Pharmacologie Appliquees Aux Effets de l'Agression 29(5): 359-363, 1988

Auditory brain stem responses short latency somatosensory evoked potentials and visual evoked potentials in pediatric neurological disorders. Otologia Fukuoka 30(Suppl. 1): 289-298, 1984

Trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials compared with median somatosensory evoked potentials and brain stem auditory evoked potentials in brain stem multiple sclerosis. Muscle & Nerve: 586, 1984