+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

How to validate clinically important change in health-related functional status. Is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating?

How to validate clinically important change in health-related functional status. Is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating?

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7(4): 399-410

Some clinical trials perform repeated measurement over time and estimate clinically relevant change in an instrument's score with global ratings of perceived change or so-called transition questions. The conceptual and methodological difficulties in estimating the magnitude of clinically relevant change over time in health-related functional status (HRFS) are discussed. This paper investigates the concordance between the amount of serially assessed change with effect size estimates (the researcher's perspective) and global ratings of perceived change (the patient's perspective). A total of 217 patients who were scheduled for diagnostic examination were included, and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, extended with MOS-20 items, was assessed before and after medical intervention (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting or pharmaco-therapy). Global questions were applied to assess perceived change over time for every item from domains of physical and emotional functioning and used as the external criterion of relevant change in the analysis of items. Global questions corresponding with overall change in these domains were used in the comparison of change in physical and emotional functioning scales. Two effect size indices were used: (i) ES (mean change/SDpooled) and (ii) ES (mean change/SDchange). A method is described to calculate a value indicating the extent of discordance between the researcher's interpretation of magnitude of change and the external criterion (the patient's perspective). Findings suggest that effect size (ES) (mean change/SDpooled) was in keeping with the magnitude of change indicated by patients' judgements, or their category of subjective meaning, for all scales. Furthermore, in cases in which the magnitude of change estimated with the SRM (mean change/SDchange) was not confirmed empirically by the external criterion ratings, the discordance could be interpreted as a trivial discordance.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046284707

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11737531

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00298.x

Related references

Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research. International Journal of Integrated Care 2: E15, 2006

Recall bias did not affect perceived magnitude of change in health-related functional status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59(5): 503-511, 2006

An ERP study of visual change detection: effects of magnitude of spatial frequency changes on the change-related posterior positivity. International Journal of Psychophysiology 62(1): 14-23, 2006

Magnitude, Location, and Factors Related to Regional and Global Sagittal Alignment Change in Long Adult Deformity Constructs: Report of 183 Patients With 2-Year Follow-up. Clinical Spine Surgery 30(7): E948-E953, 2017

Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine 26(1): 78-86; Discussion 87, 2001

Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 31(5): 578-582, 2006

Auditory event-related potentials as a function of abstract change magnitude. Neuroreport 16(3): 301-305, 2005

Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. Asian Spine Journal 2018, 2018

A comparison of traditional and Rasch cut points for assessing clinically important change in health-related quality of life among patients with asthma. Quality of Life Research 15(10): 1639-1649, 2006

What does minimal important change mean to patients? Associations between individualized goal attainment scores and disability, general health status and global change in condition. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17(2): 244-250, 2011

Assessing health-related quality of life in gynecologic oncology: a systematic review of questionnaires and their ability to detect clinically important differences and change. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 20(4): 664-684, 2010

Patients perceptions of change in function are consistently poorly related to measures of actual change. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 39(9 Suppl.): S221, 1996

The rate and magnitude of atmospheric pressure change that aggravate pain-related behavior of nerve injured rats. International Journal of Biometeorology 55(3): 319-326, 2011

The effects of magnitude and direction of stimulus change on auditory event-related potentials elicited by deviant signal stimuli. Biological Psychology 37(3): 219-234, 1994

Although the Magnitude Varied, Income-Related Inequalities in Untreated Dental Caries were Consistently Found among Young Children in 3 US Surveys. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice 16(2): 142-144, 2017