Institutional review boards and institutions not doing enough to protect human subjects
Maloney, D.M.
Human Research Report 15(6): 1-3
2000
ISSN/ISBN: 0885-0615
PMID: 12199292
Accession: 046421318
PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90
Related References
Maloney, D.M. 2003: Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects Human Research Report 18(6): 6-7Valery, M. Gordon, J Sugarman and Nancy Kass 1998: Toward a More Comprehensive Approach to Protecting Human Subjects: The Interface of Data Safety Monitoring Boards and Institutional Review Boards in Randomized Clinical Trials Irb Ethics and Human Research 20(1): 1-5
Gordon, V.M.; Sugarman, J.; Kass, N. 1998: Toward a more comprehensive approach to protecting human subjects: the interface of data safety monitoring boards and institutional review boards in randomized clinical trials Irb 20(1): 1-5
Maloney, D.M. 2002: Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects Human Research Report 17(8): 1-2
Borenstein, J. 2008: The expanding purview: institutional review boards and the review of human subjects research Accountability in Research 15(3): 188-204
Maloney, D.M. 2000: Institutional review boards not sufficiently monitoring recruitment of human subjects Human Research Report 15(8): 1-3
Maloney, D.M. 2002: Institutional review boards and approval of new products without human subjects research Human Research Report 17(7): 1-2
Lessell, S. 2001: Human studies, institutional review boards, and the protection of human subjects Archives of Ophthalmology 119(12): 1849-1850
Marshall, P.A. 2003: Human subjects protections, institutional review boards, and cultural anthropological research Anthropological Quarterly 76(2): 269-285
Gray, B.H. 1978: Institutional review boards as an instrument of assessment: research involving human subjects in the U.S Science Technology and Human Values 1978(25): Unknown
Burman, W.J.; Schooley, R.T. 2001: The role of local institutional review boards in protecting human research subjects JAMA 285(21): 2713
Beh, H.Glenn. 2002: The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system? Law and Psychology Review 26(1): 1-47
Reynolds, D. 2000: Protecting the human subjects of social science research--the role of institutional review boards Bioethics Forum 16(4): 31-36
Knepper, J.D. 1982: Use of human subjects in experimentation. Institutional review boards: purposes, protocols, legal responsibilities Journal of the American Medical Record Association 53(5): 97-101
Holm, A.; Campbell, N. 1985: The role of institutional review boards in facilitating research marketing of drugs and devices and protecting human subjects Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 11(1): 1-12
1991: Protection of human subjects; informed consent; standards for institutional review boards for clinical investigations--FDA. Final rule Federal Register 56(117): 28025-28029
1988: Protection of human subjects; informed consent; standards for institutional review boards for clinical investigations--FDA. Proposed rule Federal Register 53(218): 45678-45682
Otrompke, J. 2012: Significant changes to institutional review boards proposed: government may issue first changes in decades to the common rule on human subjects research IEEE Pulse 3(6): 59-62
Buelow, P.A. 2011: The institutional review board: a brief history of attempts to protect human subjects in research Clinical Nurse Specialist Cns 25(6): 277-280
Hyatt, R.R.; Gute, D.M.; Pirie, A.; Page, H.; Vasquez, I.; Dalembert, F. 2009: Transferring knowledge about human subjects protections and the role of institutional review boards in a community-based participatory research project American Journal of Public Health 99 Suppl. 3: S526-S531