+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Kinematic modeling for the assessment of wheelchair user's stability

Kinematic modeling for the assessment of wheelchair user's stability

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 9(4): 362-368

A computer kinematic model was developed to simulate the lateral and transverse stabilities of wheelchair users in order to compare the effect of different backrests. This model is composed of ellipsoids and parallelepipeds representing the main components of the human body, the seating devices and the wheelchair. A fifteen-segment three-dimensional (3-D) model linked by spherical and revolute joints was created using the ADAMS software (Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.). Torsional springs and dampers are used at the joints to represent four sets of articulation stiffness. Seating devices are represented with 45 rectangular surface patches. The interface between human body and seating devices is modeled by contact elements, which included the specification of stiffness, damping, and deformation of cushions and buttocks. Simulations of a user and his wheelchair moving at 1.4 m/s on a tilted pathway were performed. Different indexes [trunk lateral tilt (TLT) and trunk transverse rotation (TTR)] were measured and compared to those of a similar experimental study on four subjects. The effect of joint stiffness was quantified and a sensitivity study showed the importance of the hip, neck, lumbar, and thoracic joint stiffness on model response (between 16% and 68%). Two backrests (standard and highly contoured) were tested with the kinematic model and their stability compared. Overall, the coherence between the simulations and the experiments shows that this approach is appropriate to compare various seating devices (maximal difference of 1.3 degrees between the simulated and experimental curves for the intermediate joint stiffness sets). The smallest rotations of the highly contoured backrest (6.3 degrees versus 8.9 degrees for TLT and 3.9 degrees versus 6.7 degrees for TTR) suggest that the contouring of the mid torso is more efficient than the lower torso to provide stability to the wheelchair user. This model is an adequate tool to test and improve the design of seating aids.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046504383

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12018649

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2001.1000116

Related references

Establishing user needs for a stability assessment tool to guide wheelchair prescription. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 12(1): 47-55, 2017

Effects of user's actions on rolling resistance and wheelchair stability during handrim wheelchair propulsion in the field. Medical Engineering and Physics 35(3): 289-297, 2013

Kinematic comparison of Hybrid II test dummy to wheelchair user. Medical Engineering and Physics 23(4): 239-247, 2001

Kinematic analysis for determination of bioequivalence of a modified Hybrid III test dummy and a wheelchair user. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 42(3): 343-351, 2005

Important wheelchair skills for new manual wheelchair users: health care professional and wheelchair user perspectives. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 12(1): 28-38, 2017

Design and Fabrication of an Instrumented Handrim to Measure the Kinetic and Kinematic Information by the Hand of User for 3D Analysis of Manual Wheelchair Propulsion Dynamics. Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors 4(4): 256-266, 2014

User assessment of manual wheelchair ride comfort and ergonomics. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81(4): 490-494, 2000

Relation between kinematic analysis of wheelchair propulsion and wheelchair functional basketball classification. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 28(2): 157-172, 2011

Reliability and construct validity studies of an obstacle course assessment of wheelchair user performance. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. Internationale Zeitschrift für Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue Internationale de Recherches de Readaptation 28(1): 49-56, 2005

A case report of a severe musculoskeletal injury in a wheelchair user caused by an incorrect wheelchair ramp design. Journal of Emergency Medicine 38(2): 150-154, 2010

Evolutions of the wheelchair user's centre of mass and centre of pressure according to the seat fore-aft position during sprinting: a case study of an elite wheelchair tennis player. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 15(Suppl. 1): 210-211, 2012

Comfort and stability of wheelchair backrests according to the TAWC (tool for assessing wheelchair discomfort). Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 11(3): 223-227, 2016

Kinematic assessment of knee joint stability. Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases: 487-488, 1978

Assessment of the long term stability of the PPP kinematic GPS. Sokuchi Gakkaishi = Journal of the Geodetic Society of Japan 52(4): 309-318, 2006

From "wheelchair circuit" to "wheelchair assessment instrument for people with multiple sclerosis": reliability and validity analysis of a test to assess driving skills in manual wheelchair users with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 93(6): 1052-1058, 2012