+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review



Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review



Obstetrics and Gynecology 99(1): 145-151



To systematically review published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the safety and efficacy of 25 microg versus 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. We supplemented a search of entries in electronic databases with references cited in original studies and review articles to identify RCTs of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction, which compared repeated doses of 25 microg and 50 microg. We evaluated, abstracted data, and assessed the quality of RCTs to compare the safety and efficacy of 25 microg versus 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Five RCTs met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each outcome (random- and fixed-effects models). In addition, we aggregated the results of two separate studies, permitting an indirect comparison of the two doses being analyzed. In the meta-analysis, tachysystole and hyperstimulation syndrome appear to occur less frequently among women who received 25 microg of misoprostol than with 50 microg. However, neonatal outcomes appear to be comparable with the two doses. Regarding efficacy, use of the 50-microg dose was associated with a shorter interval to vaginal delivery, greater proportion of deliveries within 24 hours, and less frequent need for oxytocin augmentation. The indirect comparison of two studies yielded similar results. Published data indicate that intravaginal misoprostol at doses of 50 microg for cervical ripening and labor induction is more efficacious but it is unclear whether it is as safe as the 25-microg dose.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046511592

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11777525


Related references

Cervical ripening and labor induction with 25 microg vs. 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 90(3): 234-235, 2005

Oral misoprostol (100 microg) versus vaginal misoprostol (25 microg) in term labor induction: a randomized comparison. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 82(12): 1103-1106, 2003

A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 88 Suppl 2: S56-S62, 2007

Labor induction at term: a comparison of the effects of 50 microg and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology 34(2): 102-105, 2007

Intravaginal misoprostol 600 microg and 800 microg for the treatment of early pregnancy failure. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 90(3): 208-212, 2005

Pre-induction cervical ripening with 25 microg and 50 microg vaginal misoprostol in 181 nulliparous parturients. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 22(3): 265-268, 2009

Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 59(3): 155-161, 2005

Second-trimester pregnancy termination with 600-microg vs. 400-microg vaginal misoprostol and systematic curettage postexpulsion: a randomized trial. Contraception 77(1): 50-55, 2007

A comparison of vaginal misoprostol 800 microg versus 400 microg for anembryonic pregnancy: a randomized comparative trial. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 88 Suppl 2: S41-S47, 2007

A comparison of vaginal misoprostol 800 microg versus 400 microg in early pregnancy failure: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 87 Suppl 3: S18-S23, 2011

Labor induction with 25 mug versus 50 mug intravaginal misoprostol: A systematic review. Obstetrics & Gynecology 99(1): 145-151, 2002

No benefit, but increased harm from high dose (100 microg) misoprostol for induction of labour: a randomised trial of high vs. low (50 microg) dose misoprostol. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 22(6): 614-617, 2003

Double-blind, randomized study comparing the effects of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol (20 microg or 30 microg) and levonorgestrel (100 microg or 150 microg) on lipoprotein metabolism. Contraception 69(2): 105-113, 2004

Labor induction with 25-microg misoprostol vaginal capsules. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 68(4): 272-275, 2010

Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: 25 vs. 50 microg dose regimen. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 72(1): 25-30, 2001