+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Malpractice insurer's rate increase hits 15%



Malpractice insurer's rate increase hits 15%



Modern Healthcare 21(37): 13




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046608172

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10113026


Related references

Rolling back. Calif. limits malpractice insurer's rate hike. Modern Healthcare 33(36): 14, 2003

Does your malpractice insurer owe you a refund?. Medical Economics 66(20): 60-63, 1989

Hospitals sue malpractice insurer. Modern Healthcare 25(22): 13, 1995

How well does your insurer defend malpractice claims?. Michigan Medicine 105(6): 25-26, 2007

Could your malpractice insurer's files cut off your privileges?. Medical Economics 62(10): 88-91, 1985

IMJ interview. The physician as malpractice insurer. Illinois Medical Journal 162(3): 190-196, 1982

Insurer's malpractice rates indicate stability. Modern Healthcare 23(34): 10, 1993

Finally: doctors win big against a malpractice insurer. Medical Economics 71(8): 90-1, 95-6, 100 Passim, 1994

Medical malpractice from the viewpoint of the insurer. Zeitschrift für Arztliche Fortbildung 89(6): 575-580, 1995

How a malpractice insurer grew too big & too fast. Medical Economics 79(18): 60-2, 68-70, 2002

Will your malpractice insurer stifle your defense?. Medical Economics 75(1): 36, 39-40, 43-8, 1997

Prompt malpractice insurer notice necessary. Healthspan 8(2): 23, 1991

S-O-S! When a malpractice insurer sinks, how do its doctors survive?. West Virginia Medical Journal 94(4): 186-191, 1998

A new incarnation. N.J. malpractice insurer to become 'reciprocal' firm. Modern Healthcare 32(19): 28, 2002

A malpractice insurer threw this doctor to the wolves. Medical Economics 68(17): 50-56, 1991