+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion



Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion



American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 113(6): 661-673



The growth potential of individuals with Class II malocclusions is of interest to the practicing orthodontist because such malocclusions constitute a significant percentage of cases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate on cross-sectional and longitudinal bases the changes in mandibular length and relationship and maxillary-mandibular relationships in untreated Class II subjects from deciduous to permanent dentition and also to evaluate the effects of orthodontic treatment, with and without the extraction of first premolars, on these relationships. Class II samples were compared with matched normal, untreated individuals. The Class II division 1 (Class II/1) untreated sample comprised 30 subjects, 15 males and 15 females. Each subject had a complete set of data at three stages of dental development-namely, Stage I, after the completion of eruption of the deciduous dentition; Stage II, at the time when the permanent first molars and most of the incisors have erupted (i.e., in mixed dentition); and Stage III, at the completion of eruption of the permanent dentition, excluding third molars. The Class II treated sample comprised 44 subjects (21 males, 23 females) treated with four first-premolar extractions and 47 subjects (20 males, 27 females) treated without extraction. Treatment was accomplished with the use of an edgewise appliance, appropriate extraoral traction, and Class II elastics. The extraction decision was based mainly on the presence of crowding and profile consideration. Records on 35 normal subjects (20 males, 15 females) were available from the Iowa Longitudinal Facial Growth Study. Cephalograms for the normal individuals were matched to the corresponding ages of the Class II cases. With regard to these findings, few consistent differences were noted between the untreated Class II/1 and normal subjects on cross-sectional comparisons. The differences in mandibular length and position were more evident in the early stages of development than at later stages. Longitudinal comparisons of growth profiles indicated that the growth trends were essentially similar between the untreated Class II/1 and normal subjects in the various parameters compared. The comparisons of growth magnitude indicated the presence of greater skeletal facial convexity in the untreated Class II/1 subjects, accompanied by a tendency for a more retruded mandible. Initial comparisons between the Class II/1 treated groups and normal subjects indicated that the Class II/1 malocclusions were associated with a larger overjet, deeper overbite, and greater ANB angle. After a 5-year treatment and observation period, an overall "normalization" in the mandibular and maxillary-mandibular skeletal relationships was noted in the treated Class II/1 subjects in both the extraction and the nonextraction groups compared with normal subjects. The changes were more pronounced in the extraction group.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046619720

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9637570

DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70227-6


Related references

Mathematical models of longitudinal mandibular growth for children with normal and untreated Class II, division 1 malocclusion. European Journal of Orthodontics 10(3): 227-234, 1988

The length of mandibular basal bone in normal occlusion and class I malocclusion compared to class II, division I malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics 34(7): 610-617, 1948

Changes in mandibular incisor position in Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with premolar extractions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 124(6): 708-713, 2003

A Class II, Division 1 malocclusion: A malocclusion with a significant mandibular arch length deficiency. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 110(6): 688-693, 1996

Comparative study of some mandibular characteristics in Class I and Class II, division I, malocclusion, (Angle). Ortodontia 8(2): 125-138, 1975

Analysis of mandibular position of patients with angles Class I and Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 36(5): 367-370, 2001

Comparative study of some mandibular characteristics in class I and class II, division 1, malocclusion. Revista Da Faculdade de Odontologia Da Universidade de Sao Paulo 11(1): 75-82, 1973

Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 134(1): 125-137, 2008

Three-dimensional assessment of the temporomandibular joint and mandibular dimensions after early correction of the maxillary arch form in patients with Class II division 1 or division 2 malocclusion. Korean Journal of Orthodontics 45(3): 121-129, 2015

Mandibular displacement in Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102(6): 509-518, 1992

A longitudinal study on growth in untreated children with Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 61(1): 20-33, 2000

Occlusal changes from adolescence to adulthood in untreated patients with Class II Division 1 deepbite malocclusion. Angle Orthodontist 69(1): 33-38, 1999

A longitudinal study of condylar growth and mandibular rotation in untreated subjects with class II malocclusion. Angle Orthodontist 72(2): 105-111, 2002

Treatment of severe mandibular retrusion in class II, division 2 malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics 76(2): 149-164, 1979

Treatment of a Class II Division 1 malocclusion with a high mandibular angle. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 118(3): 341-346, 2000