+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Mandibular distraction force: laboratory data and clinical correlation



Mandibular distraction force: laboratory data and clinical correlation



Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 59(5): 539



In vitro data were collected to measure torque-force values of an internal distraction device. The measurements were correlated with in vivo torque readings in an attempt to better understand the force required to distract the osteogenic bone callus of the human mandible during distraction osteogenesis. Five internal craniofacial distraction devices were mounted on an apparatus to test load limits and torque measurements. The apparatus aligned the devices so that weight provided a force opposite and parallel to the vector of distraction. Weights were added in 5-lb increments, and the devices were activated 0.5 mm for each torque reading. Torque readings were obtained from a calibrated torque wrench. Measurements were plotted on a graph and correlated with clinical torque readings obtained from 8 patients undergoing mandibular lengthening. The average torque for distracting the human mandible 0.5 mm twice a day was 4.2 +/- 1.6 Newton-centimeters (N-cm). The average slope of the in vitro data shows that 4.2 N-cm of torque is equivalent to a force of 35.6 N. The average force of device failure was 235.8 N. Torque-force diagrams offer an effective means for calibrating safety margins and load capabilities for internal distraction devices. Quantification of axial forces encountered in mandibular lengthening will help contribute to the overall understanding and biomechanics of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046619738

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11326380

DOI: 10.1053/joms.2001.22688


Related references

Correlation of biomechanical stiffness with plain radiographic and ultrasound data in an experimental mandibular distraction wound. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 32(3): 296-304, 2003

Innovation in anterior mandibular alveolar distraction osteogenesis: introduction of a new bone-borne distraction device and first clinical results. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 40(8): E503-E508, 2012

Bite force and occlusal contact area changes following mandibular widening using distraction osteogenesis. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 101(4): 432-436, 2006

In vivo study of human mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Part I: bone transport force determination. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics 14(4): 3, 2012

Molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction: Part 1: Laboratory study. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 13(2): 205-211, 2002

Attachments for a mandibular distraction device for use in mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Official Gazette of the United States Patent & Trademark Office Patents 1209(1): 260, 1998

The correlation between clinical laboratory data and telomeric status of male patients with metabolic disorders and no clinical history of vascular events. Aging Male 14(1): 21-26, 2011

Correlation of laboratory and clinical data during treatment of leprosy. Annales de la Societe Belge de Medecine Tropicale 52(6): 537-548, 1972

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a clinical experience of the last 17 years. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 20(Suppl. 2): 1794-1800, 2009

Molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction: clinical experience. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 112(5): 1239-1246, 2003

Seven years clinical experience with mandibular distraction in children. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 26(4): 197-208, 1998

Correlation of clinical, laboratory, and antomical data in apoplectic strokes. Zh Nevropatol Psikhiat Im S S Korsakova 66(9): 1359-1363, 1966

Reliability of distraction vector transfer in unilateral vertical distraction of the mandibular ramus. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 16(1): 15-22, 2005

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis by sagittal split osteotomy and intraoral curvilinear distraction. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 15(4): 631-635, 2004

Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: part III. Gradual distraction versus acute lengthening. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 107(2): 441-453, 2001