+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems



Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems



International Journal of Prosthodontics 13(3): 246-253



A prospective study on mandibular implant-supported overdentures using more than 2 Brånemark implants splinted with multiple round bars evaluated a hypothesis that unnecessary prosthodontic maintenance would result from the contravention of accepted biomechanical principles. A randomized prospective trial on 59 edentulous patients details prosthodontic maintenance and complications of 52 mandibular overdentures (11 unsplinted, 41 splinted) over a 3-year period. Prosthodontic maintenance was greater in the first year than in subsequent years, regardless of design. Comparison between the splinted designs with round bars revealed no statistically significant difference with either retentive clip activation or fractures. More than 70% of the retention clips in the 2-implant (single round bar) design needed activation, as compared to 44% of those with the 3-implant (double round bar) or 4-implant (triple round bar) design. Retention clip fracture occurred in 30% of patients with 3 or 4 implants and 16% of those with 2 implants. Relining the overdentures, regardless of design, revealed an excessive maintenance burden in 40% of overdentures. Remaking of overdentures was necessary in 21% of patients. Multiple round bars splinting 3 or 4 implants can still be a treatment concept in mandibular overdenture treatment. Results from prospective evaluation of this design indicate less prosthodontic maintenance of clip activation but more clip fractures than with 2 implants splinted with single round bars, although not at statistically significant levels.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046619811

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11203640


Related references

Mandibular two-implant overdentures: prosthodontic maintenance using different loading protocols and attachment systems. International Journal of Prosthodontics 24(5): 405-416, 2011

Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service. International Journal of Prosthodontics 15(3): 259-266, 2002

Mandibular two-implant overdentures: three-year prosthodontic maintenance using the locator attachment system. International Journal of Prosthodontics 24(4): 328-331, 2011

The prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular mucosa- and implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature. International Journal of Prosthodontics 13(3): 238-243, 2000

Mandibular overdentures: professional time for prosthodontic maintenance during the first year of service using three different implant systems. International Journal of Prosthodontics 15(4): 379-384, 2002

Prosthodontic treatment, patient response, and the need for maintenance of complete implant-supported overdentures: an appraisal of 5 years of prospective study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 10(4): 345-354, 1997

The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 21(6): 514-520, 2008

Implant overdentures: bar versus ball attachment for mandibular implant supported overdentures--a randomised clinical trial. Sadj 59(1): 28-29, 2004

Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: attachment systems, and number and locations of implants--Part I. Journal of the Irish Dental Association 61(2): 93-97, 2015

Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: attachment systems, and number and locations of implants--Part II. Journal of the Irish Dental Association 61(3): 144-148, 2015

Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 14(Suppl. 1): E11, 2012

Prosthodontic maintenance requirements of implant-retained overdentures using the locator attachment system. International Journal of Prosthodontics 25(4): 392-394, 2012

Effect of attachment type on load distribution to implant abutments and the residual ridge in mandibular implant-supported overdentures. Journal of Dental Biomechanics 6: 1758736015576009, 2015

Maxillary Three-Implant Overdentures Opposing Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: 10-Year Prosthodontic Outcomes. International Journal of Prosthodontics 29(4): 327-336, 2016

Clinical evaluation of mandibular overdentures supported by multiple-bar fabrication: a follow-up study of two implant systems. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 10(5): 595-603, 1995