+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Mandibular outline assessment in three groups of orthodontic patients



Mandibular outline assessment in three groups of orthodontic patients



European Journal of Orthodontics 24(6): 605-614



The feasibility of using computer-based parameters for quantifying mandibular asymmetry was investigated. Four methods of calculating asymmetry were used, based on the digitized facial photographs of three groups of patients: those with no observable asymmetry, a group with mild asymmetry, and a group presenting for orthognathic surgery. Three of the methods involved right/left difference ratios, namely, area, perimeter length, and compactness. The fourth, moment ratio (centre of area), was expressed as a percentage. Repeatability of both photography and digitization proved satisfactory, the standard deviation of the differences between repeated photographs being 0.016 and 0.014 for area and compactness ratios, respectively. Area, perimeter, and compactness successfully discriminated between the three groups. For area, median ratios (deviations from 1.00) for the 'normal', 'mild asymmetry', and 'surgical' groups were 0.015, 0.030, and 0.078, respectively. Those patients in the surgical group for whom asymmetry correction had been the main reason for surgery recorded higher asymmetry scores than the other subjects in that group. Moment ratio did not adequately distinguish between the three groups. Better repeatability for digitization was found when a baseline involving the ear insertions was used, than either the outer or inner canthi of the eyes. The potential uses of this approach are presented in relation to clinically relevant mild asymmetry, as well as auditing the outcome of surgical correction.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046619891

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12512778


Related references

Mandibular outline assessment in three groups of orthodontic patients. The European Journal of Orthodontics 24(6): 605-614, 2002

Assessment of skeletal maturation with permanent mandibular second molar calcification stages among a group of Nepalese orthodontic patients. Clinical Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry 8: 57-62, 2016

Harmonization of free mandibular movements by orthodontic-surgical treatment of patients with mandibular retrognathism. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 15(3): 205-231, 2000

Osseous changes of the mandibular condyle affect backward-rotation of the mandibular ramus in Angle Class II orthodontic patients with idiopathic condylar resorption of the temporomandibular joint. Cranio 37(4): 264-271, 2019

A computerized photographic assessment of the relationship between skeletal discrepancy and mandibular outline asymmetry. European Journal of Orthodontics 28(2): 97, 2006

Mixed-methods assessment of perceptions of mandibular anterior malalignment and need for orthodontic retreatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 150(4): 592-600, 2016

Outline of the programme of a medical unit for the assessment of nutritional status of population groups. Bibliotheca Nutritio et Dieta 7: 171-191, 1965

Assessment of early orthodontic treatment on functional shifts by telemonitoring mandibular movements using a smart phone. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2018: 1357633x18800876, 2018

Assessment of pain and discomfort during early orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion using the Removable Mandibular Retractor Appliance. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 14(2): 119-124, 2013

Relationship between orthodontic expertise and perception of need for orthodontic treatment for mandibular protrusion in Japan. Acta Medica Okayama 67(5): 277-283, 2013

Severe mandibular retrognathism: orthodontic versus surgical orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 72(2): 176-182, 1977

Orthodontic treatment of Class III patients with mandibular asymmetry. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 43(12): 723-726, 2008

Orthodontic-surgical treatment of patients with mandibular hypoplasia. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Tandheelkunde 109(5): 172-177, 2002

Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 135(1): 66-72, 2009

Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. Angle Orthodontist 88(5): 545-551, 2018