+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Maturation of the posterolateral spinal fusion and its effect on load-sharing of spinal instrumentation. An in vivo sheep model



Maturation of the posterolateral spinal fusion and its effect on load-sharing of spinal instrumentation. An in vivo sheep model



Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 79(11): 1710-1720



We investigated the temporal relationship among the biomechanical, radiographic, and histological properties of a posterolateral spinal fusion mass to elucidate the changes in load-sharing of the spinal instrumentation and that of the fusion mass throughout the healing process. Destabilization of the posterior spinal column and transpedicular screw fixation at the segments between the third and fourth and the fifth and sixth lumbar vertebrae was performed in twenty-four sheep. A posterolateral spinal arthrodesis with use of autologous corticocancellous bone graft was done randomly at one of the two segments; the other segment (without bone graft) served as the instrumented control. Six animals each were killed at four, eight, twelve, and sixteen weeks postoperatively. Biomechanical testing showed that the posterolateral fusion mass had increased mechanical stiffness after the fourth week. The strain on the hardware, measured with use of rods instrumented with strain-gauges, decreased significantly (p < 0.01) beginning at eight weeks. Radiographically, three independent observations of each of the six animals at each time-period showed that, although all of the fusion masses were considered solid unions at sixteen weeks, bridging of trabecular bone was noted during only ten of eighteen observations at twelve weeks, three of eighteen observations at eight weeks, and none of eighteen observations at four weeks. Computerized tomography and histomorphometric analyses demonstrated that mineralization in the fusion mass increased in a linear fashion even after eight weeks. Histologically, the fusion mass consisted predominantly of woven bone at eight weeks; thereafter, it was gradually trabeculated. We found a great discrepancy between biomechanical stability and histological maturation of the posterolateral fusion mass. The biomechanical properties of a stable spinal fusion preceded the radiographic appearance of a solid fusion by at least eight weeks, suggesting that immature woven bone provided substantial stiffness to the fusion mass. The spinal instrumentation was subjected predominantly to bending stress rather than to axial stress, and the load-sharing of the spinal instrumentation decreased concurrently with the development of the spinal fusion.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 046631795

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9384431


Related references

Does spinal instrumentation influence the healing process of posterolateral spinal fusion? An in vivo animal model. Spine 24(11): 1058-1065, 1999

The effects of rigid spinal instrumentation and solid bony fusion on spinal kinematics. A posterolateral spinal arthrodesis model. Spine 23(7): 767-773, 1998

Ketogenic diet delays spinal fusion and decreases bone mass in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: an in vivo rat model. Acta Neurochirurgica 160(10): 1909-1916, 2018

The effects of magnesium particles in posterolateral spinal fusion: an experimental in vivo study in a sheep model. Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine 6(2): 141-149, 2007

The influence of lumbar lordosis on spinal fusion and functional outcome after posterolateral spinal fusion with and without pedicle screw instrumentation. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques 15(3): 187-192, 2002

Effect of the type of electrical stimulation on spinal fusion in a rat posterolateral spinal fusion model. Spine Journal 19(6): 1106-1120, 2019

An investigational study on the healing process of anterior spinal arthrodesis using a bioactive ceramic spacer and the change in load-sharing of spinal instrumentation. Spine 30(8): E195-E203, 2005

Enhanced spinal fusion using a biodegradable porous mesh container in a rat posterolateral spinal fusion model. Spine Journal 14(3): 408-415, 2014

The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on posterolateral spinal fusion. A prospective, randomized study with a two-year follow-up. Ugeskrift for Laeger 161(13): 1920-1925, 1999

Posterolateral spinal fusion with ostegenesis induced BMSC seeded TCP/HA in a sheep model. Tissue and Cell 46(2): 152-158, 2014

The effects of doxorubicin (adriamycin) on spinal fusion: an experimental model of posterolateral lumbar spinal arthrodesis. Spine Journal 4(6): 669-674, 2004

The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on spinal fusion: using the model of posterolateral intertransverse fusion in rabbits. Journal of Trauma 52(2): 333-338, 2002

The role of spinal instrumentation in augmenting lumbar posterolateral fusion. Spine 21(3): 278-287, 1996

Experimental model of posterolateral spinal arthrodesis in sheep Part 2 Application of the model Evaluation of vertebral fusion obtained with coral or with a biphasic ceramic. Spine 19(24): 2798-2803, 1994

1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine 22(24): 2813-2822, 1998