+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Perceiving a strong causal relation in a weak contingency: further investigation of the evidential evaluation model of causal judgement



Perceiving a strong causal relation in a weak contingency: further investigation of the evidential evaluation model of causal judgement



Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 55(1): 97-114



Contingency information is information about the occurrence or nonoccurrence of a certain effect in the presence or absence of a candidate cause. An objective measure of contingency is the deltaP rule, which involves subtracting the probability of occurrence of an effect when a causal candidate is absent from the probability of occurrence of the effect when the candidate is present. Causal judgements conform closely to deltaP but deviate from it under certain circumstances. Three experiments show that such deviations can be predicted by a model of causal judgement that has two components: a rule of evidence, that causal judgement is a function of the proportion of relevant instances that are judged to be confirmatory for the causal candidate, and a tendency for information about instances in which the candidate is present to have greater effect on judgement than instances in which the candidate is absent. Two experiments demonstrate how this model accounts for some recently published findings. A third experiment shows that it is possible to use the model to predict the occurrence of high causal judgements when the objective contingency is close to zero.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 046944335

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11873858

DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000181


Related references

Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. B, Comparative and Physiological Psychology 58(2): 99-140, 2005

Causal judgement from contingency information: judging interactions between two causal candidates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 55(3): 819-838, 2002

Causal attribution from covariation information: the evidential evaluation model. European Journal of Social Psychology 32(5): 667-684, 2002

Causal Judgement: Use of Different Types of Contingency Information as Confirmatory and Disconfirmatory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 10(2): 131-170, 1998

Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: effects of relative prevalence of the two causes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 57(6): 961-991, 2004

Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 56(6): 977-1007, 2003

Weighting of contingency information in causal judgement: evidence of hypothesis dependence and use of a positive-test strategy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62(12): 2388-2408, 2010

Causal powers and preventers: An explanatory account of cue interaction effects in human causal judgement. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 21(8): 1226-1274, 2009

Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: II. Effects of information about one cause on judgements of the other cause. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 58(6): 999-1021, 2005

The complex & greatly debated problem of spondylarthrosis in forensic medicine in industry; medicolegal study; its evaluation as an occupational causal or associated-causal factor in relation to Law 9688 & its regulation. El Dia Medico 30(51): 1941-1946, 1958

Causal judgement as evaluation of evidence: The use of confirmatory and disconfirmatory information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A Human Experimental Psychology 56A(3): 491-513, 2003

Causal judgement as evaluation of evidence: The use of confirmatory and disconfirrnatory information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 56(3): 491-513, 2003

Perceiving the causes of unemployment: An evaluation of the Causal Dimensions Scale in a real-life situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(2): 347-356, 1988

The Effects of Causal Uncertainty, Causal Importance, and Initial Attitude on Attention to Causal Persuasive Arguments. Social Cognition 26(1): 44-65, 2008

Causal Networks or Causal Islands? The Representation of Mechanisms and the Transitivity of Causal Judgment. Cognitive Science 39(7): 1468-1503, 2016