+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Public disclosure of performance information in Pennsylvania: impact on hospital charges and the views of hospital executives



Public disclosure of performance information in Pennsylvania: impact on hospital charges and the views of hospital executives



Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 24(9): 491-502



Forty states have now passed legislation establishing governmental agencies charged with the task of gathering hospital-level data. Since 1988 all acute care hospitals in Pennsylvania have been submitting data to the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4). Pennsylvania's policy was designed to make patients and purchasers more informed and selective buyers of medical services, to increase the public accountability of providers of these services, and to encourage hospitals and physicians to compete more on clinical outcomes and charges. The impact of Pennsylvania's policy of public disclosure of performance information on hospital charges over time has not previously been evaluated. Nor has the importance that hospital executives assign to the publication of comparative charges and clinical outcomes information been assessed. From 1990 through 1994 the PHC4 published a number of hospital-level performance reports (including the regional Hospital Effectiveness Reports and A Consumer's Guide to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) containing hospital average charges, average lengths of stay, a rating of severity of illness, and two outcome measurements--morbidity and in-hospital mortality--on a total of 59 diagnosis-related groups. An 18-item survey designed to assess hospital executives' opinions of the usefulness and importance of the PCH4 information was sent to the chief executive officers at the study hospitals. There were no significant trends toward a reduction in the dispersion of charges in either category of hospitals during the study period. Most hospital executives assigned low ratings of importance to published comparative charges information; however, executives of high-competition hospitals assigned significantly higher importance ratings to the information as a whole in enouraging hospital competition based on quality.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 047127106

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9770639

DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30398-4


Related references

Public reporting and pay-for-performance: safety-net hospital executives' concerns and policy suggestions. Inquiry 44(2): 137-145, 2007

The perceived impact of public reporting hospital performance data: interviews with hospital staff. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 23(6): 697-704, 2012

"What is meant by public?": Stakeholder views on strengthening impacts of public reporting of hospital performance data. Social Science & Medicine 202: 143-150, 2018

Why has 'historic' public disclosure of hospital performance data attracted so little attention?. JAMA 273(9): 689-690, 1995

The Hospital Utilization Project. A modern medical information system for Pennsylvania hospital. Pennsylvania Medicine 73(3): 65-67, 1970

The financial impact and drivers of hospital charges in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample hospital analysis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 165(2): 301-310, 2017

Performance evaluation of public hospital information systems by the information system success model. Healthcare Informatics Research 21(1): 43-48, 2015

Public reporting of hospital performance data: views of senior medical directors in Victoria, Australia. Australian Health Review, 2017

Hospital executives face the public eye. Hospitals 64(17): 97-97, 1990

Hospital stays, hospital charges, and in-hospital deaths among infants with selected birth defects--United States, 2003. Mmwr. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 56(2): 25-29, 2007

The impact of inappropriate antibiotics on bacteremia patients in a community hospital in Taiwan: an emphasis on the impact of referral information for cases from a hospital affiliated nursing home. Bmc Infectious Diseases 13(): 500-500, 2014

Error reporting and disclosure systems: views from hospital leaders. JAMA 293(11): 1359-1366, 2005

Performance evaluation for hospital executives. Hospital Progress 51(6): 74-78, 1970

Pennsylvania's early discharge legislation: effect on maternity and infant lengths of stay and hospital charges in Philadelphia. Health Services Research 36(6 Pt 1): 1073-1083, 2002

Automated hospital information systems. A primer for trustees and executives. Part two. Oh. Osteopathic Hospitals 28(7): 14-7, 21, 1984