+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Recognition thresholds for plane-rotated pictures of familiar objects



Recognition thresholds for plane-rotated pictures of familiar objects



Acta Psychologica 112(1): 17-41



We investigated picture plane rotation effects on the minimum stimulus duration required to recognise pictures of familiar objects in a picture-word verification task. Participants made unspeeded responses, selecting from 126 written alternatives. Longer stimulus durations were needed to identify plane-misoriented views. These orientation effects were non-linear, arguing against a simple mental rotation account of compensation for plane misorientation in identification tasks. Orientation effects were found for almost all items, in particular including those labelled at the basic level (cf. Hamm, McMullen, 1998, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, 413-426). We suggest that plane misorientation increases the difficulty of basic level as well as subordinate level identification unless only a small, visually dissimilar set of stimuli are presented. Errors in the task were analysed to provide an alternative, objective measure of perceived visual similarity, by assessing the number and nature of mistaken identifications made to a given target object. We propose that misorientation effects are best understood in terms of the effects of the perceived visual similarity of a target to its set of response alternatives rather than in terms of the level (basic or subordinate) at which the target is to be identified.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 047188806

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12423898


Related references

The effect of prior experience on recognition thresholds for plane-disoriented pictures of familiar objects. Memory & Cognition 27(4): 751-758, 1999

The effects of plane rotation on the recognition of brief masked pictures of familiar objects. Memory & Cognition 26(4): 791-803, 1998

Effects of plane rotation, task, and complexity on recognition of familiar and chimeric objects. Memory & Cognition 30(4): 499-510, 2002

Determining the orientation of depth-rotated familiar objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15(1): 208-214, 2008

A stereo disadvantage for recognizing rotated familiar objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16(5): 832-838, 2010

Category effects on the processing of plane-rotated objects. Perception 29(3): 287-302, 2000

The effect of background on recognition of rotated objects. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 35(4): 1625, 1994

The role of surface features in the recognition of rotated objects. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 37(3): S177, 1996

Laterality effects in the recognition of depth-rotated novel objects. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 4(1): 100-111, 2004

Network analysis of recognition of familiar and novel pictures. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 21(1-3): 1440, 1995

The influence of perceived rotary motion on the recognition of rotated objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5(1): 140-146, March, 1998

Recognition times of different views of 56 depth-rotated objects: A note concerning Verfaillie and Boutsen (1995). Perception and Psychophysics 60(5): 900-907, 1998

Do left and right matter for haptic recognition of familiar objects?. Perception 38(9): 1355-1376, 2010

The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 130(2): 238-255, 2001