+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Recovery evaluation in a pediatric heart surgery unit using the AP-DRG classification system (All Patient Diagnosis Related Groups)



Recovery evaluation in a pediatric heart surgery unit using the AP-DRG classification system (All Patient Diagnosis Related Groups)



Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia 26(10): 1157-1174



The evaluation of Health Care activities, particularly of those concerning hospitals, is one of the most important aims for the National Health Service for a "fair" resource allocation. In the recent past a great bulk of research has been directed to methods for patient classifications in relation to resource needs. Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) is one of the most important patient classification systems related to resource allocation which has been developed in the U.S. Medicare Program (HCFA-DRGs) during the eighties and more recently adopted all over Europe, Italy included. Wide experimentation has been developed during the recent past concerning DRGs confirming its validity, but also has disclosed its limits, mostly concerning applicability outside U.S., identification of specific patient subgroups (like the pediatric patient population) and capability in distinguishing patients with apparently similar resource needs, but different clinical severity conditions. In order to overcome such limits, DRGs have been subjected to some important modification: All patient DRG (AP-DRG) is a system which should pay more attention to some patient subgroups, such as the pediatric one. Research is still looking for methods, easily extensible to the whole hospital informative system concerning the possibility of distinguishing patients with different level of severity condition. With the double aim of experiment the actual utility in the use of AP-DRG, more than HCFA-DRG in a pediatric population and find further indexes for complexity and/or severity characterization of the hospital case-mix, the 1992 in-patients hospital files of the pediatric cardiosurgery hospital CREAS-IFC-CNR was reviewed. Results confirm that some increase in the identification of the case-mix do occur by using the AP-DRG system, even if a better clinical characterization could be possible (i.e. AP-DRG 108). Of particular interest is the fact that descriptive statistical analysis of position and variability parameters do confirm the importance of the length of stay as a brief index for hospital efficiency evaluation and its organizative model characterization.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 047193600

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9005161


Related references

Accuracy of the all patient refined diagnosis related groups classification system in congenital heart surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 97(2): 641-650, 2014

A psychiatric patient classification system. An alternative to diagnosis-related groups. Medical Care 27(5): 543-557, 1989

Breast cancer surgery and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries. Breast 22(5): 723-732, 2013

Patient reported quality of care before vs. after the implementation of a diagnosis related groups (DRG) classification and payment system in one Swedish county. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 15(4): 283-294, 2001

Reimbursement by current German diagnosis-related groups system penalises complex congenital heart surgery. Cardiology in the Young 24(2): 344-350, 2014

5. Conference on nursing research. 17-19 October 1995; Foundation Calouste Gulbenkian. Patient classification system in diagnosis-related groups 14--cerebrovascular diseases. Servir 44(4): 193-198, 1996

Diagnosis related groups, refined diagnosis related groups and pediatric modified diagnosis related groups in specialist children's hospitals. Australian Health Review 13(3): 163-181, 1990

A department of general surgery using the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) system. Evaluation of the case series. Minerva Chirurgica 47(20): 1615-1618, 1992

Congenital heart surgery: applicability of hospital reimbursement according to German diagnosis-related groups system in conformity with the Aristotle complexity score. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon 58(6): 328-332, 2010

Development of classification and payment system of in patient hospital admissions in the United States: introduction of Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups (MS-DRGs) and the Present On Admission (POA) indicator. Igiene e Sanita Pubblica 63(6): 691-701, 2008

Diseases of the digestive system and a system for patient classification: diagnostic-related groups (DRG). Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas 88(10): 677-686, 1996

Diagnosis related groups and the salvageable trauma patient in the intensive care unit. Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics 163(6): 539-542, 1986

Prognostic value of 2 patient classification systems: APACHE II and diagnosis-related groups. Medicina Clinica 102(16): 613-615, 1994

Prospective pricing system by diagnosis-related groups: comparison of federal diagnosis-related groups with high-risk obstetric care groups. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 156(3): 567-573, 1987

An evaluation of pediatric-modified diagnosis-related groups. Health Care Financing Review 15(2): 51-70, 1993