+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Severity scores in respiratory intensive care: APACHE II predicted mortality better than SAPS II

Severity scores in respiratory intensive care: APACHE II predicted mortality better than SAPS II

Respiratory Care 40(10): 1042-1047

In recent years several scoring systems have been developed to describe the severity of illness, to establish the individual prognosis, and to group adult ICU patients by predicted risk of mortality. In addition, these scores can be used to measure and/or compare the quality of care in different ICUs. We compared the mortality predictions of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score and a new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) in patients with respiratory disease who require intensive care. We prospectively studied all 306 admissions from January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1994. McNemar and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to describe and analyze our data. The average APACHE II score was 17.5 (SD 6.0), corresponding to a mean predicted death rate of 24.9% (SD 17.2%) as compared to an observed overall RICU mortality rate of 21.6%. The average SAPS II score was 39.1 (SD 11.1) corresponding to a mean predicted death rate of 26.0% (SD 18.4%). The ratio between the actual and predicted hospital mortality was 86% for APACHE II and 83% for SAPS II. Survivors had a significantly lower predicted risk of death than nonsurvivors (p < 0.0001) with both indices, and a higher Glasgow coma scale score (p < 0.0001). The ROC-curve analysis suggested the superior predictive ability of APACHE II in our patients. Area under the APACHE II ROC curve was 80.88% (standard error [SE] 2.89%), significantly larger (p < 0.01) than that found for SAPS II (73.52%, SE 3.61%). The APACHE II score was a good predictor of hospital outcome and better than SAPS II in our population.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 047352297

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10152703

Related references

Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care. Clinical Epidemiology 3(): 203-211, 2011

Validation of the APACHE IV model and its comparison with the APACHE II, SAPS 3, and Korean SAPS 3 models for the prediction of hospital mortality in a Korean surgical intensive care unit. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 67(2): 115-122, 2014

The impact of low-risk intensive care unit admissions on mortality probabilities by SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III. Anaesthesia 57(1): 21-26, 2002

Determinants of the calibration of SAPS II and SAPS 3 mortality scores in intensive care: a European multicenter study. Critical Care 21(1): 85-85, 2017

Comparison of the accuracy and correctness of mortality estimates for Intensive Care Unit patients in internal clinics of the Czech Republic using APACHE II, APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPMoIII models. Medicinski Glasnik 13(2): 82-89, 2016

Severity of illness assessment with application of the APACHE IV predicted mortality and outcome trends analysis in an academic cardiac intensive care unit. Journal of Critical Care 50: 242-246, 2019

Resource utilization and outcome in gravely ill intensive care unit patients with predicted in-hospital mortality rates of 95% or higher by APACHE III scores: the relationship with physician and family expectations. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 80(2): 166-173, 2005

ICU severity of illness scores: APACHE, SAPS and MPM. Current Opinion in Critical Care 20(5): 557-565, 2015

Mortality in an intensive care unit: predictive value of APACHE II severity score versus maximum APACHE. Revista Medica de Chile 121(1): 52-58, 1993

Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia 101(6): 798-803, 2008

Evaluation of the scoring systems APACHE II, APACHE III, SAPS II, and MPM II at a German Interdisciplinary Intensive Care Unit. Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin 35(8): 691-698, 1998

A comparison of APACHE II and SAPS II scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality in Thai adult intensive care units. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 90(4): 643-652, 2007

The performance of customised APACHE II and SAPS II in predicting mortality of mixed critically ill patients in a Thai medical intensive care unit. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 37(5): 784-790, 2010

Comparison of two simplified severity scores (SAPS and APACHE II) for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Critical Care Medicine 17(5): 409-413, 1989

Severity scores apache ii and saps in decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Acta Anaesthesiologica Italica 42(SUPPL 1): 21-28, 1991