+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement



Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement



International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 16(5): 713-721



Xenografts have been used extensively, either alone or in combination with autogenous bone, in sinus floor elevation techniques. However, controversy exists regarding the need to cover the lateral osteotomy site with a membrane. Also, the healing period before loading remains undefined when machined-surface implants are placed. Twenty-nine patients showing reduced bone volume in the posterior maxilla had 61 Brånemark System implants placed in 30 sinuses augmented with a lateral osteotomy approach. Sinuses grafted with Bio-Oss and covered with a collagen membrane Bio-Gide (M+) received 29 implants, while grafted but uncovered sites (M-) received 32 implants. An immediate procedure was followed to place 41 implants and a staged procedure was used for 20 implants. Abutment connection was made in 2 distinct postoperative periods: 6 to 9 months and over 9 months. The patients were followed for an average of 22.4 months. The survival rate of the implants was dependent on the postoperative healing time and membrane presence. In case of the immediate procedure and in M- sites, when residual bone height was less than 5 mm, more failures occurred when the loading was done at 6 to 9 months than after 9 months. No failures occurred in the M- series when a staged approach was followed. The overall survival rate was 78.1% for the M- sites and 93.1% for the M+ sites. No failures occurred (0/35) in the control implants placed in adjacent native bone. Implant survival rate was related to the quality of the reconstructed cortical plate and to implant length. The concomitant use of a collagen barrier to cover the osteotomy site, when machined-surface implants were used in sinus grafting, seemed to improve the quality of the graft healing and survival rate of the implants loaded between 6 and 9 months after placement.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 047377985

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11669254


Related references

Maxillary sinus floor elevation for implant placement with demineralized freeze-dried bone and bovine bone (Bio-Oss): a clinical study of 20 patients. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 17(3): 232-241, 1997

Clinical application of implant-supported rehabilitation with osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafting and simultaneous implant placement. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 17(6): 578-581, 2008

Influence of particle size of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on new bone formation and implant stability after simultaneous sinus floor elevation: a histomorphometric study in minipigs. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 17(2): 274-285, 2015

Evaluation of clinical results on osteotome sinus floor elevation and dental implant placement (122 cases report). Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 41(3): 136-139, 2006

Sinus Elevation Through Transcrestal Window Approach and Delayed Implant Placement in 1- to 2-mm Residual Alveolar Bone: A Case Report. Implant Dentistry 25(6): 866-869, 2016

Staged osteotome sinus floor elevation for progressive site development and immediate implant placement in severely resorbed alveolar bone: a case report. Case Reports in Dentistry 2013: 310931, 2013

Two-Center Prospective, Randomized, Clinical, and Radiographic Study Comparing Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation with or without Bone Graft and Simultaneous Implant Placement. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 18(5): 873-882, 2016

Maxillary sinus floor elevation and grafting with deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a clinical and histomorphometric study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 23(8): 918-924, 2012

Sinus floor elevation using a composite graft: clinical outcome of immediate implant placement. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 28(1): 252-260, 2014

Maxillary sinus-floor elevation with nanoporous biphasic bone graft material for early implant placement. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 16(3): 365-373, 2014

Clinical evaluation of a bilayered collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) supported by autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 16(6): 857-863, 2002

Patient-reported outcomes of implant placement performed concomitantly with transcrestal sinus floor elevation or entirely in native bone. Clinical Oral Implants Research 28(2): 156-162, 2017

Comparative evaluation of simultaneous maxillary sinus floor elevation and implant placement with residual bone heights greater or less than 5 mm. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 30(1): 179-183, 2015

Osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafting and simultaneous implant placement in the atrophic maxilla: a pilot study. Indian Journal of Dental Research 22(6): 786-789, 2012

Maxillary sinus floor elevation with bovine bone mineral combined with either autogenous bone or autogenous stem cells: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22(3): 251-258, 2011