+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Submerged intraoral device for mandibular lengthening



Submerged intraoral device for mandibular lengthening



Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 25(3): 116-123



The authors report a new technique for mandibular distraction. Lengthening of the mandible by gradual intraoral distraction was obtained in nine young patients. An intraoral device was used in order to avoid external scars. Seven patients had hemifacial microsomia, one patient had a ramus hypoplasia after TMJ ankylosis and one patient had the Treacher-Collins syndrome. The amount of mandibular lengthening ranged from 12 to 28 mm depending on the duration of expansion. Retention after expansion, to allow ossification to take place, lasted for 3 weeks on average. The follow-up period ranged from a minimum of 5 months to a maximum of 44 months.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 047472174

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9234090

DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(97)80002-9


Related references

Mandibular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis using osseointegrated implants and an intraoral device: a preliminary report. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 54(5): 594-600, 1996

Intraoral distraction osteogenesis: maxillary and mandibular lengthening. Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 7(1): 111-151, 1999

Mandibular lengthening by intraoral distraction using osseointegrated implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 11(2): 186-193, 1996

Intraoral distraction for mandibular lengthening: a technical innovation. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 24(2): 92-95, 1996

Mandibular lengthening using preprogrammed intraoral tooth-borne distraction devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 57(11): 1318-22; Discussion 1322-3, 1999

Introduction of an intraoral bone-lengthening device. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 96(4): 978-981, 1995

Hemifacial microsomia treated with mandibular lengthening using intraoral distractors. On precise indications. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthetique 46(5): 516-526, 2001

Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a patient with severe micrognathia secondary to TMJ ankylosis using a tooth and bone-anchored device (PIT device): a case report. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 58(12): 1429-1433, 2000

Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible using a submerged intraoral device: a report of three cases. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 57(2): 192-198, 1999

Evaluation of the treatment for micromandibular deformity by distraction osteogenesis with submerged intraoral device. Chinese Journal of Dental Research 2(3-4): 31-37, 1999

Reactivation of a mandibular lengthening device for maximal distraction. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 6(5): 412-413, 1995

Mandibular lengthening in micrognathic infants with the internal distraction device. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery 8(1): 60-64, 2006

The treatment of patients with mandibular fractures in the angle area using an intraoral monomaxillary device. Stomatologiia .(5): 51-53, 1991

Mandibular lengthening with an implanted motor-driven device: preliminary study in sheep. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 37(4): 273-276, 1999

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis using an intraoral device and bite plate for a case of hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 40(4): 437-445, 2003