+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects



The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects



Journal of Medical Ethics 26(5): 334-339



The increasing emphasis on evidence-based clinical practice has thrown into sharp focus multiple deficiencies in current systems of ethical review. This paper argues that a complete overhaul of systems for ethical oversight of studies involving human subjects is now required as developments in medical, epidemiological and genetic research have outstripped existing structures for ethical supervision. It shows that many problems are now evident and concludes that sequential and piecemeal amendments to present arrangements are inadequate to address these. At their core present systems of ethical review still rely on the integrity and judgment of individual investigators. One possible alternative is to train and license research investigators, make explicit their responsibilities and have ethics committees devote much more of their time to monitoring research activity in order to detect those infringing the rules.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 047588963

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11055035

DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.5.334


Related references

The Case for a New System for Oversight of Research on Human Subjects. Journal of Medical Ethics 26(5): 334-339, 2000

Improving protection for human research subjects: better oversight, not just more oversight. American Journal of Bioethics 8(11): 13-15, 2008

Designing Oversight for Nanomedicine Research in Human Subjects: Systematic Analysis of Exceptional Oversight for Emerging Technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13(4): 1449-1465, 2011

Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress II: principles and recommendations for oversight of an institution's financial interests in human subjects research. Academic Medicine 78(2): 237-245, 2003

Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress I: policy and guidelines for the oversight of individual financial interests in human subjects research. Academic Medicine 78(2): 225-236, 2003

Revolution or reform in human subjects research oversight. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics 40(4): 922-929, 2012

New oversight agency proposed for human research subjects. Human Research Report 15(3): 9, 2000

Federal oversight and regulation of human subjects research -- an update. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10(3): 261-264, 2000

'Human subjects research' as stigmatized activity: Implications for oversight reform. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior 71: 417-419, 2015

National, independent oversight: reinforcing the safety net for human subjects research. Accountability in Research 7(2-4): 303-309, 1999

NBAC report calls for increased federal oversight of research on human subjects. Journal of Investigative Medicine 49(4): 307-308, 2001

Recommendations for nanomedicine human subjects research oversight: an evolutionary approach for an emerging field. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics 40(4): 716-750, 2012

Moving beyond compliance: measuring ethical quality to enhance the oversight of human subjects research. Irb 29(5): 9, 2007

Post-approval monitoring and oversight of U.S.-initiated human subjects research in resource-constrained countries. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11(2): 119-123, 2014

Why Research Oversight Bodies Should Interview Research Subjects. Irb 39(2): 8, 2018