+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The impact of diabetes mellitus on survival after myocardial infarction: can it be modified by drug treatment? Results of a population-based myocardial infarction register follow-up study



The impact of diabetes mellitus on survival after myocardial infarction: can it be modified by drug treatment? Results of a population-based myocardial infarction register follow-up study



Diabetologia 43(2): 218-226



Mortality of diabetic patients after myocardial infarction remains high despite recent improvement in their management. This study population-based evaluates the impact of cardiovascular drug therapy on mortality within 28 days and during 5-year follow-up in diabetic compared with non-diabetic patients. Using the MONICA Augsburg register from 1985 to 1992, 2210 inpatients with incident Q-wave myocardial infarction aged 25-74 years were included, of whom 468 had diabetes. Primary end point was mortality within 28 days and over 5 years. General linear model procedures were used for age-adjustment, controlling for sex, and testing significance; hazard risk ratios were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards model procedures. During the 5-year follow-up, 598 subjects died (396 diabetic, 202 non-diabetic). The mortality rate within 28 days was 12.6% in diabetic patients (women 18.0%, men 9.9%) and 7.3% in non-diabetic patients (p = 0.001). Mortality in diabetic patients over 5 years was increased by 64% (95% confidence interval 1.39-1.95) compared with non-diabetic patients. This was considerably reduced (p < 0.001) in patients treated with thrombolytic drugs (risk ratio: diabetes 0.57, no diabetes 0.65) and with beta blockers (0.62 and 0.64) and antiplatelets (0.76 and 0.74) at hospital discharge. Mortality of diabetic patients treated with these drugs was reduced to that of non-diabetic patients without such treatment (risk ratio 1.01 to 1.27; p > 0.1). Diabetic patients after myocardial infarction are at particularly high risk of dying, but benefit clearly from treatment with thrombolytics, beta blockers and antiplatelets. This study does not, however, allow any inferences to be drawn for treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or the impact of left ventricular function.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 047658866

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10753044

DOI: 10.1007/s001250050032


Related references

Diabetes mellitus and myocardial infarction Results of a population-based register follow-up study. European Heart Journal 17(ABSTR SUPPL ): 332, 1996

Impact of diabetes on mortality after the first myocardial infarction. The FINMONICA Myocardial Infarction Register Study Group. Diabetes Care 21(1): 69-75, 1998

Temporal trends in prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a population-based cohort of incident myocardial infarction and impact of diabetes on survival. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 81(8): 1034-1040, 2006

Prospective randomised study of intensive insulin treatment on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. DIGAMI (Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction) Study Group. Bmj 314(7093): 1512-1515, 1997

Prognostic implications of glucose-lowering treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction and diabetes: experiences from an extended follow-up of the Diabetes Mellitus Insulin-Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI) 2 Study. Diabetologia 54(6): 1308-1317, 2011

Determinants of treatment strategies and survival in acute myocardial infarction: a population-based study in the Florence district, Italy: results of the acute myocardial infarction Florence registry (AMI-Florence). European Heart Journal 24(13): 1195-1203, 2003

Long-term survival after myocardial infarction: relationship with thrombolysis and discharge medication. Results of the Augsburg Myocardial Infarction Follow-up Study 1985 to 1993. European Heart Journal 17(8): 1199-1206, 1996

Intensified insulin-based glycaemic control after myocardial infarction: mortality during 20 year follow-up of the randomised Diabetes Mellitus Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI 1) trial. Lancet. Diabetes and Endocrinology 2(8): 627-633, 2015

Acute myocardial infarction in a south german population results from the augsburg myocardial infarction register 1985. Zeitschrift fuer Kardiologie 77(8): 481-489, 1988

Different impact of diabetes mellitus on in-hospital and 1-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 27(2): 180-188, 2012

Impact of diabetes and gender on survival after acute myocardial infarction in the Province of Quebec, Canada--a population-based study. Diabetic Medicine 26(6): 609-616, 2010

Diabetes mellitus and trends in hospital survival after myocardial infarction, 1994 to 2006: data from the national registry of myocardial infarction. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 5(6): 791-797, 2013

Glycometabolic state at admission: Important risk marker of mortality in conventionally treated patients with Diabetes mellitus and Acute Myocardial Infarction: Long-term results from the Diabetes and Insulin-Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI) study. Circulation 99(20): 2626-2632, 1999

Impact of history of diabetes mellitus on hospital mortality in men and women with first acute myocardial infarction. The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Participants. American Journal of Cardiology 85(12): 1486-9; A7, 2000

Magnitude, treatment, and impact of diabetes mellitus in patients hospitalized with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: A community-based study. Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research 13(1): 13-20, 2016