+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The relationship between choice of outcome measure and hospital rank in general surgical procedures: implications for quality assessment



The relationship between choice of outcome measure and hospital rank in general surgical procedures: implications for quality assessment



International Journal for Quality in Health Care 9(3): 193-200



Institutional complication rates are often used to assess hospital quality of care, particularly for conditions and procedures where mortality rates are not useful because deaths are rare. The objective of this study was to assess the correlation among hospital quality assessment rankings based on adjusted mortality, complication and failure-to-rescue rates. This study used a clinically detailed administrative data set to compare severity and case-mix adjusted hospital outcome rankings for three different measures of quality of care: in-hospital death, complication and failure-to-rescue (in-hospital death following a complication). Analysis of 74,647 patients who underwent general surgical procedures included in the 1991 and 1992 MedisGroups National Comparative Data Base. Adjusted outcomes of death, complication and failure to rescue based on multivariable logistic regression models. For 142 hospitals, the correlation between hospital rankings based on the death rate and those ranked by the complication rate was only 0.208 (P = 0.013). A similarly low correlation was present between the complication and failure rate rankings, r = -0.090 (P = 0.287). A higher correlation was observed between the death and failure rate rankings, r = 0.90 (P < 0.001). For general surgical procedures, hospital rank using the complication rate is poorly correlated with rankings using the death or failure rate. Complication rates should be used with great caution and should not be used in isolation when assessing hospital quality of care.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 047715271

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9209916

DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/9.3.193


Related references

Hospital quality rank depends on choice of outcome measure. Clinical Research 41(2): 181A, 1993

Quality of life assessment in laparoscopic general surgical procedures. Gastroenterology 118(4 Suppl 2 Part 2): AGA A1082, April, 2000

The relationship of hospital market concentration, costs, and quality for major surgical procedures. American Journal of Surgery 216(6): 1037-1045, 2018

Improving the quality of the surgical preoperative assessment in a district general hospital. Bmj Quality Improvement Reports 4(1): -, 2016

CRP levels as a measure of surgical trauma: a comparison of different general surgical procedures. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 39(2): 86-88, 1994

Community-wide assessment of intensive care outcomes using a physiologically based prognostic measure: implications for critical care delivery from Cleveland Health Quality Choice. Chest 115(3): 793-801, 1999

Variation in surgical quality measure adherence within hospital referral regions: do publicly reported surgical quality measures distinguish among hospitals that patients are likely to compare?. Health Services Research 49(4): 1108-1120, 2014

Clinical features and outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit after plastic surgical procedures: implications for cost reduction and quality of care. Annals of Plastic Surgery 39(1): 74-79, 1997

Clinical outcome and hospital charges of surgical versus non-surgical revascularization procedures for proximal LAD disease. European Heart Journal 18(ABSTR SUPPL ): 54, 1997

CHoice of Outcome In Cbt for psychosEs (CHOICE): the development of a new service user-led outcome measure of CBT for psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin 36(1): 126-135, 2010

The relative importance of quality of care information when choosing a hospital for surgical treatment: a hospital choice experiment. Medical Decision Making 31(6): 816-827, 2011

Readmission to hospital: a measure of quality or outcome?. Quality & Safety in Health Care 13(1): 10-11, 2004

Assessment by the primary care physician of his influence on the patient's hospital choice and of his own ability to evaluate hospital quality. Harefuah 129(3-4): 90-5, 159, 1995

Safety and outcome of general surgical open and laparoscopic procedures during pregnancy. Surgical Endoscopy 25(5): 1574-1578, 2011

Quality of life as an outcome measure in surgical oncology. British Journal of Surgery 88(5): 643-652, 2001