+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The variability of bite force measurement between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch



The variability of bite force measurement between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch



Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 25(9): 681-686



The effect of measuring bite force with different patterns of transducer on different occasions was studied. Maximum voluntary bite force was measured in eight volunteers. Three transducer positions, each with a different pattern of transducer, were used; between the anterior teeth, between the second premolar and the first molar on one side and between the second premolars and first molars on both sides. Visual feedback of force was provided. Two sets of five maximum clenches were recorded with a rest period in between. This sequence was repeated for each transducer and the experiment was repeated on three different days. The highest forces were measured with the bilateral posterior transducer (mean 580 N, s.d. 235) and the lowest on the anterior transducer (mean 286 N, s.d. 164). The standard deviations of the bite force mean values were used as an indication of the variability and were subjected to a non-parametric anova (Kruskal-Wallis). The forces recorded with each transducer position were significantly different between the transducers (P < 0.01) and the maximum bite force showed least variability when measured between the posterior teeth on one side only. There was little difference in bite force between the three different sessions (P > or = 0.05) when measured in the same position within the dental arch, whichever of the three positions that may be.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 047761261

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9758398

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00293.x


Related references

Bite force distribution on the dental arch in normal dentitions. Morimoto, T, Matsuya, T, Takada, K International Congress Series; Brain and oral functions: Oral motor function and dysfunction 399-403, 1995

Studies of the position of the median line of the dental arch. 2. The relations among the positions of the median line of the dental arch, the facial median line, and the labial frenulum. Shika Gakuho. Dental Science Reports 74(1): 159-164, 1974

Dental arch bite registration device. Official Gazette of the United States Patent & Trademark Office Patents 1192(1): 206, Nov 5, 1996

Quantitative determination of the dental arch by polygon measurement in the ideal and anomalous arch. Schweizerische Monatsschrift für Zahnheilkunde 83(6): 682-709, 1973

Force delivery from a transpalatal arch for the correction of unilateral first molar cross-bite. European Journal of Orthodontics 15(5): 411-420, 1993

The morphologic study of the dental arch in Shanghai children at prepermanent teeth stage: The size of the lower dental arch and the relation between the upper and lower dental arch. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 1(1): 25-28, 1992

The elliptic representation of variations in tooth positions on the dental arch. Nichidai Koku Kagaku 10(3): 272-277, 1984

A new method to determine tooth positions and dental arch dimensions. Journal of Dental Research 51(4): 1104-1104, 1972

A new study of positions, in which leveling of mandibular dental arch was required. Informationen aus Orthodontie und Kieferorthopadie 19(3): 319-29, 331-3, 1987

Open bite with deformity of the upper dental arch a case. International Journal of Oral Surgery 11(4): 270-272, 1982

The effect of a lip bumper on lower dental arch dimensions and tooth positions. European Journal of Orthodontics 17(2): 129-134, 1995

Case report on the artificially open bite following widening of the dental arch. Schweizerische Monatsschrift für Zahnheilkunde 78(2): 180-189, 1968

Dental arch width in Class II Division 2 deep-bite malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 122(6): 608-613, 2002

The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 51(5): 323-331, 1993