+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector



Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector



Medical Physics 28(1): 11-15



Solid-state digital x-ray imaging detectors of flat-panel construction will play an increasingly important role in future medical imaging facilities. Solid-state detectors that will support both dynamic (including fluoroscopic) and radiographic image recording are under active development. The image quality of an experimental solid-state digital x-ray image detector operating in a continuous fluoroscopy mode has been investigated. The threshold contrast detail detectability (TCDD) technique was used to compare the fluoroscopic imaging performance of an experimental dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector with that of a reference image intensifier television (IITV) fluoroscopy system. The reference system incorporated Plumbicon TV. Results were presented as a threshold detection index, or H(T)(A), curves. Measurements were made over a range of mean entrance air kerma (EAK) rates typically used in conventional IITV fluoroscopy. At the upper and mid EAK rate range (440 and 220 nGy/s) the solid-state detector outperformed the reference IITV fluoroscopy system as measured by TCDD performance. At the lowest measured EAK rate (104 nGy/s), the solid-state detector produces slightly inferior TCDD performance compared with the reference system. Although not statistically significant at this EAK rate, the difference will increase as EAK is lowered further. Overall the TCDD results and early clinical experiences support the proposition that a current design of dynamic solid-state detector produces image quality competitive with that of modern IITV fluoroscopy systems. These findings encourage the development of compact and versatile universal x-ray imaging systems based upon solid-state detector technology to support R & F and vascular/interventional applications.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 047782766

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11213916

DOI: 10.1118/1.1312814


Related references

Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems. British Journal of Radiology 77(921): 751-758, 2004

Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis. Physics in Medicine and Biology 56(14): 4221-4238, 2011

Perception of image quality in direct digital radiography after application of various image treatment filters for detectability of dental disease. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 22(3): 131-134, 1993

Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy. Radiology 218(3): 679-682, 2001

Technical report: Initial experiences with an experimental solid-state universal digital X-ray image detector. Clinical Radiology 53(12): 923-928, 1998

Efficiency of low-contrast detail detectability in fluoroscopic imaging. Medical Physics 24(5): 655-664, 1997

Assessment of image quality and low-contrast detectability in abdominal CT of obese patients: comparison of a novel integrated circuit with a conventional discrete circuit detector at different tube voltages. European Radiology 25(3): 687-693, 2015

Evaluation of cassette-based digital radiography detectors using standardized image quality metrics: AAPM TG-150 Draft Image Detector Tests. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 17(5): 6008-6008, 2016

Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality. Physics in Medicine and Biology 50(23): 5731-5742, 2005

Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality. European Radiology 28(7): 2951-2959, 2018

Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector. Acta Radiologica. Supplementum 43(427): 1-43, 2002

Dynamic Unsharpness Optimization and Image Quality Improvement in the URI/230-Ametist Digital X-Ray Image Intensifier. Biomedical Engineering 36(5): 243-245, 2002

Optimization of dynamic fuzziness and enhancement of image quality of an URI/230-Amethyst digital image intensifier. Meditsinskaia Tekhnika 2003(5): 6-8, 2003

Measurements from digital scanned projection radiographs: couch detail and detector artefact removal by simple image enhancement. British Journal of Radiology 58(692): 756-759, 1985

Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. Radiology 150(2): 569-575, 1984