+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review



Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review



International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 13(4): 539-545



Edentulous patients with a severely resorbed mandible often experience problems with their dentures. Treatment concepts involving two to four implants for the support of an overdenture have been proposed. The aim of this study was to develop a treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants based on a review of the literature. It is proposed that two implants supporting a mandibular overdenture (bar construction) are sufficient for most applications. Four implants were indicated in situations involving a dentulous maxilla, a narrow mandibular arch, extreme resorption of the mandible (bone height greater than 12 mm), and mandibular soreness and pain.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 047829056

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9714961


Related references

Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20(7): 722-728, 2009

Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5-year prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16(1): 19-25, 2005

Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants in a 10-year prospective comparative study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 25(6): 1168-1174, 2011

Reconstruction of the shallow vestibule edentulous mandible with simultaneous split thickness skin graft vestibuloplasty and mandibular endosseous implants for implant-supported overdentures. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 67(2): 381-386, 2009

Success and survival rates of mandibular overdentures supported by two or four implants: a systematic review. Brazilian Oral Research 28: 74-80, 2014

A 3- to 6-year study of overdentures supported by hydroxyapatite-coated endosseous dental implants. International Journal of Prosthodontics 11(6): 610-619, 1999

Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 26(4): 263-267, 1997

The prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular mucosa- and implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature. International Journal of Prosthodontics 13(3): 238-243, 2001

The impression procedure for overdentures supported by two endosseous implants in the lower jaw. A comparison among three permucosal implant systems. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Tandheelkunde 99(9): 326-328, 1992

Effect of cantilever length on stress distribution around implants in mandibular overdentures supported by two and three implants. European Journal of Dentistry 10(3): 333-340, 2016

The effect of location and number of endosseous implants on retention and stability of magnetically retained mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 21(6): 511-513, 2009

Immediate loading of Brånemark implants: a 24-month follow-up of a comparative prospective pilot study between mandibular overdentures supported by Conical transmucosal and standard MK II implants. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 4(4): 190-199, 2002

The masticatory efficiency of mandibular implant-supported overdentures as compared with tooth-supported overdentures and complete dentures. Journal of Oral Implantology 28(5): 238-243, 2002

Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosteal implants: A prospective, comparative study. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 27(6): 435-439, 1998