+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Tubal surgery vs in vitro fertilization for the treatment of infertility due to distal tubal occlusion



Tubal surgery vs in vitro fertilization for the treatment of infertility due to distal tubal occlusion



Primary Care Update for Ob/Gyns 5(4): 168



Background: The optimal treatment of infertility due to tubal occlusion has not been established. Many practitioners feel that the success of tubal repair exceeds that of in vitro fertilization (IVF); however, previous studies of pregnancy after tubal surgery have been limited by bias in patient selection, follow-up, or surgical expertise. The purpose of the present study was to determine the outcome after repair of distal tubal occlusion performed by experienced surgeons in an unselected patient population with consistent follow-up.Design: Chart review with telephone contact of patients lost to follow-up.Methods: The records of all tubal surgery performed between 1989 and 1996 at the University of Alabama Hospital and The Kirklin Clinic outpatient surgery facility were reviewed. All women with infertility due to distal tubal occlusion, with or without pelvic adhesions, who had no other significant infertility factors were included for study. Details of the infertility history, operative procedure, and postoperative course were recorded. Patients lost to follow-up within 1 year after surgery were contacted by telephone for information regarding subsequent testing and treatment and pregnancy outcome.Results: Eighty-three women aged 19-39 years met the entry criteria for this study. Follow-up of at least 1 year was obtained in all but 11 patients. Tubal surgery was accomplished by laparotomy in 19 women; 64 women underwent tubal repair by laparoscopy. Within 1 year of surgery, 9 hysterosalpingograms, 51 clomiphene cycles, and 20 gonadotropin cycles were performed on the study group. Pregnancy was achieved within 1 year in 13 women; of these, there were 6 live births (9.6% birth rate per surgery), 2 spontaneous abortions, and 3 ectopic pregnancies. There were no live births among women who underwent tubal repair by laparotomy. None of the postoperative gonadotropin cycles resulted in pregnancy. Seven women underwent IVF within 1 year after surgery because of extensive tubal damage noted at surgery. Based on current charges for the infertility treatments performed, the cost of a live birth with tubal surgery exceeded $120,000, versus less than $50,000 per live birth with IVF using results obtained nationally or at UAB.Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of reconstructive surgery in unselected patients with distal tubal occlusion is less than that of IVF. Empiric use of gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation does not improve pregnancy rates after tubal surgery. In our series, laparoscopic tubal repair seemed to give results superior to that of laparotomy.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 047847044

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10838314


Related references

Assessment of tubal competency by the american infertility society afs classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion indication of microsurgery and in vitro fertilization ivf et. Japanese Journal of Fertility & Sterility 37(1): 125-130, 1992

Tubal ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a role for proximal occlusion or salpingectomy after failed distal tubal surgery?. Fertility and Sterility 56(4): 691-695, 1991

In vitro fertilization: effective alternative to surgery for distal tubal occlusion. Virginia Medical Quarterly 118(1): 26-30, 1991

The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertility and Sterility 49(6): 944-955, 1988

Falloposcopic tuboplasty for bilateral tubal occlusion. A novel infertility treatment as an alternative for in-vitro fertilization?. Human Reproduction 13(1): 71-74, 1998

In vitro fertilization applied for tubal and non-tubal causes of infertility. Asia-Oceania Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 12(4): 483-488, 1986

Correlation between the American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy, and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery. Fertility and Sterility 64(5): 924-929, 1995

Distal tubal occlusion microsurgical salpingostomy or in vitro fertilization. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization & Embryo Transfer 1(2): 148, 1984

Microsurgery and in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer for infertility resulting from distal tubal lesions. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 36(7): 527-530, 1991

Distal tubal occlusion: microsurgery versus in vitro fertilization--a review. International Journal of Fertility 33(2): 107-115, 1988

Tubal infertility in the Gambia: chlamydial and gonococcal serology in women with tubal occlusion compared with pregnant controls. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 63(6): 1107-1113, 1985

Indications for the treatment of tubal infertility patients by microsurgery or in vitro fertilization. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 24(4): 262-264, 1984

The current role of microsurgery and in vitro fertilization in the treatment of tubal infertility. Revue Francaise de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique 80(8-9): 607-612, 1985

Renaissance of surgical recanalization for proximal fallopian tubal occlusion: falloposcopic tuboplasty as a promising therapeutic option in tubal infertility. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 18(5): 651-659, 2011

Surgery: Microsurgery and in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer for infertility resulting from pathological proximal tubal blockage. Human Reproduction 11(12): 2613-2617, 1996