+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of diagnostic protocols for interpretation of frequency doubling perimetry visual fields in glaucoma



A comparison of diagnostic protocols for interpretation of frequency doubling perimetry visual fields in glaucoma



Journal of Glaucoma 15(4): 310-314



Frequency doubling perimetry (FDP) shows good correlation with achromatic automated perimetry in the assessment of glaucoma. However, many recommended protocols lead to a significant number of false positives and negatives. Therefore, it may be difficult to identify visual field loss owing to glaucoma. We investigated the accuracy of a diagnostic protocol that only considered either temporal wedge, arcuate, or nasal step field loss on an FDP field as significant. Sixty-eight subjects who were glaucoma suspects, glaucoma patients or normal controls were recruited selectively. After achromatic automated perimetry and FDP visual field testing, results were compared between a conventional protocol and ones that took into account the position of FDP visual field loss. If an FDP field was considered abnormal only when either a temporal wedge, an arcuate or a nasal step defect was present, the presence of a nasal step yielded the most accurate results with the least false positives (kappa coefficient=0.76) and with only minimal increase in false negatives, compared with a conventional FDP protocol (kappa coefficient=0.70). Although, not statistically significant in this case, our results suggested a trend that a diagnostic protocol which considers nasal step FDP field loss significant may have a greater degree of accuracy when compared with conventional protocols and may facilitate interpretation in a clinical setting.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048057529

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16865008

DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212239.34089.03


Related references

Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. American Journal of Ophthalmology 129(3): 328-333, March, 2000

Topography of the frequency doubling perimetry visual field compared with that of short wavelength and achromatic automated perimetry visual fields. British Journal of Ophthalmology 90(1): 70-74, 2005

The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. II. A prospective comparison of frequency doubling perimetry, the GDx nerve fibre analyser and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients. Acta Ophthalmologica 87(4): 429-432, 2008

Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry. Archives of Ophthalmology 121(12): 1705-1710, 2003

Visual field progression with frequency-doubling matrix perimetry and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in healthy controls. JAMA Ophthalmology 131(12): 1565-1572, 2014

Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology 143(2): 263-271, 2006

Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry to standard achromatic automated perimetry in glaucoma. IOVS 40(4): S842, March 15, 1999

Comparison of Frequency Doubling Perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in glaucoma and age-related maculopathy. IOVS 41(4): S87, March 15, 2000

Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry and standard achromatic computerized perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Graefe's Archive for Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 239(5): 351-355, June, 2001

Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Collegium Antropologicum 29 Suppl 1: 111-113, 2005

Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry, and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry to Monitor Glaucoma Progression. Medicine 95(7): E2618-E2618, 2016

Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 52(10): 7325-7331, 2011

Comparison between results obtained with traditional perimetry and those with frequency doubling perimetry in initial phase chronic simple glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. Supplement: 24-26, 2001

Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and multifocal visual evoked potential in glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, and control patients. Clinical Ophthalmology 8(): 1323-1330, 2014