+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Are automated molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculations realistic tools in lead optimization? An evaluation of the linear interaction energy (LIE) method



Are automated molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculations realistic tools in lead optimization? An evaluation of the linear interaction energy (LIE) method



Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 46(5): 1972-1983



An extensive evaluation of the linear interaction energy (LIE) method for the prediction of binding affinity of docked compounds has been performed, with an emphasis on its applicability in lead optimization. An automated setup is presented, which allows for the use of the method in an industrial setting. Calculations are performed for four realistic examples, retinoic acid receptor gamma, matrix metalloprotease 3, estrogen receptor alpha, and dihydrofolate reductase, focusing on different aspects of the procedure. The obtained LIE models are evaluated in terms of the root-mean-square (RMS) errors from experimental binding free energies and the ability to rank compounds appropriately. The results are compared to the best empirical scoring function, selected from a set of 10 scoring functions. In all cases, good LIE models can be obtained in terms of free-energy RMS errors, although reasonable ranking of the ligands of dihydrofolate reductase proves difficult for both the LIE method and scoring functions. For the other proteins, the LIE model results in better predictions than the best performing scoring function. These results indicate that the LIE approach, as a tool to evaluate docking results, can be a valuable asset in computational lead optimization programs.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048303440

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16995728

DOI: 10.1021/ci0601214


Related references

What determines the van der Waals coefficient β in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations?. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 34(3): 395-402, 1999

What determines the van der Waals coefficient beta in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations?. Proteins 34(3): 395-402, 1999

Efficient nonequilibrium method for binding free energy calculations in molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 11(2): 423-435, 2015

Charges for Large Scale Binding Free Energy Calculations with the Linear Interaction Energy Method. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 5(2): 380-395, 2009

Absolute and relative binding free energy calculations of the interaction of biotin and its analogs with streptavidin using molecular dynamics/free energy perturbation approaches. Proteins 16(3): 226-245, 1993

Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 47(4): 1018-1030, 2004

Discovery and optimization of triazine derivatives as ROCK1 inhibitors: molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations. Molecular Biosystems 9(3): 361-374, 2013

Exploring the molecular design of protein interaction sites with molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations. Biochemistry 48(2): 399-414, 2009

Molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations of netropsin and distamycin binding to an AAAAA DNA binding site. Nucleic Acids Research 33(2): 725-733, 2005

Absolute binding free energy calculations using molecular dynamics simulations with restraining potentials. Biophysical Journal 91(8): 2798-2814, 2006

Computational investigation of the HIV-1 Rev multimerization using molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculations. Proteins 80(6): 1633-1646, 2012

Decoding molecular mechanism of inhibitor bindings to CDK2 using molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculations. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2019: 1-12, 2019

Insights into the effects of mutations on Cren7-DNA binding using molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 17(8): 5704-5711, 2015

Understanding the microscopic binding mechanism of hydroxylated and sulfated polybrominated diphenyl ethers with transthyretin by molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculations. Molecular Biosystems 13(4): 736-749, 2017

Exploring the Interaction Mechanism Between Cyclopeptide DC3 and Androgen Receptor Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Free Energy Calculations. Frontiers in Chemistry 6: 119, 2018