+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Assessment of patient satisfaction with various configurations of digital CROS and BiCROS hearing aids



Assessment of patient satisfaction with various configurations of digital CROS and BiCROS hearing aids



Ear, Nose, and Throat Journal 85(7): 427-30, 442



We conducted a study of 91 patients with severe-to-profound asymmetric hearing loss to assess their satisfaction with digital contralateral routing of signal (CROS) or bilateral contralateral routing of signal (BiCROS) hearing aids, Satisfaction was evaluated on the basis of the number of patients who elected to purchase their hearing aid following a free 30-day trial and on the results of a subsequent 8-question survey. We found that overall patient satisfaction was generally high. At the end of the 30-day trial, 66 of the 91 patients (72.5%) elected to keep their CROS or BiCROS device, a percentage that is far greater than the acceptance rates of 10 to 20% that had been previously reported with older models of the CROS and BiCROS devices. According to the survey responses, those who kept their devices gave them an overall rating of 3.4 on a scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied); those who returned their devices gave them an overall rating of 1.9.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 048321061

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16909811


Related references

CROS hearing aids: a breakthrough for the unilaterally deaf patient and for others with special hearing problems. Connecticut Medicine 31(12): 855-858, 1967

Benefits from, Satisfaction with, and Self-Efficacy for Advanced Digital Hearing Aids in Users with Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Seminars in Hearing 39(2): 158-171, 2018

Speech perception in noise with BICROS hearing aids. Scandinavian Audiology 21(4): 261-264, 1992

Usage of CROS and IROS hearing aids by patients with bilateral high-frequency hearing loss. Ear and Hearing 3(1): 24-29, 1982

Directional audiometry. V. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in patients with monaural hearing loss treated with hearing aids (CROS). Acta Oto-Laryngologica 74(1): 37-44, 1972

A historical perspective on digital hearing AIDS: how digital technology has changed modern hearing AIDS. Trends in Amplification 11(1): 7-24, 2007

CROS hearing aids and their effects. Scandinavian Audiology. Supplementum 1978(Suppl 8): 54-60, 1978

Children's use of CROS hearing aids. Archives of Otolaryngology 103(12): 712-716, 1977

Non-occluding earmolds with CROS and IROS hearing aids. Archives of Otolaryngology 89(3): 512-522, 1969

Evaluation of patient satisfaction with different hearing aids: A study of 107 patients. Ear, Nose, and Throat Journal 96(1): E22-E28, 2017

Auditory satisfaction of patients fitted with hearing aids in the Brazilian Public Health Service and benefits offered by the hearing aids. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 79(5): 538-545, 2014

Level of user satisfaction with hearing AIDS and environment: the international outcome inventory for hearing AIDS. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 18(3): 229-234, 2015

Usage of CROS hearing aids by unilaterally deaf patients. Archives of Otolaryngology 105(6): 328-332, 1979

Experience with Classic Cros Hearing Aids in Unilateral Deafness. Scandinavian Audiology 5(1): 17-23, 1976

Patient satisfaction with bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids: the Birmingham experience. Journal of Laryngology and Otology. Supplement: 37-46, 2002