+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Beyond the Evidence of the New Hypertension Guidelines. Blood pressure measurement - is it good enough for accurate diagnosis of hypertension? Time might be in, for a paradigm shift (I)



Beyond the Evidence of the New Hypertension Guidelines. Blood pressure measurement - is it good enough for accurate diagnosis of hypertension? Time might be in, for a paradigm shift (I)



Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine 6(1): 6



Despite widespread availability of a large body of evidence in the area of hypertension, the translation of that evidence into viable recommendations aimed at improving the quality of health care is very difficult, sometimes to the point of questionable acceptability and overall credibility of the guidelines advocating those recommendations.The scientific community world-wide and especially professionals interested in the topic of hypertension are witnessing currently an unprecedented debate over the issue of appropriateness of using different drugs/drug classes for the treatment of hypertension. An endless supply of recent and less recent "drug-news", some in support of, others against the current guidelines, justifying the use of selected types of drug treatment or criticising other, are coming out in the scientific literature on an almost weekly basis. The latest of such debate (at the time of writing this paper) pertains the safety profile of ARBs vs ACE inhibitors.To great extent, the factual situation has been fuelled by the new hypertension guidelines (different for USA, Europe, New Zeeland and UK) through, apparently small inconsistencies and conflicting messages, that might have generated substantial and perpetuating confusion among both prescribing physicians and their patients, regardless of their country of origin.The overwhelming message conveyed by most guidelines and opinion leaders is the widespread use of diuretics as first-line agents in all patients with blood pressure above a certain cut-off level and the increasingly aggressive approach towards diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. This, apparently well-justified, logical and easily comprehensible message is unfortunately miss-obeyed by most physicians, on both parts of the Atlantic.Amazingly, the message assumes a universal simplicity of both diagnosis and treatment of hypertension, while ignoring several hypertension-specific variables, commonly known to have high level of complexity, such as:- accuracy of recorded blood pressure and the great inter-observer variability,- diversity in the competency and training of diagnosing physician,- individual patient/disease profile with highly subjective preferences,- difficulty in reaching consensus among opinion leaders,- pharmaceutical industry's influence, and, nonetheless,- the large variability in the efficacy and safety of the antihypertensive drugs.The present 2-series article attempts to identify and review possible causes that might have, at least in part, generated the current healthcare anachronism (I); to highlight the current trend to account for the uncertainties related to the fixed blood pressure cut-off point and the possible solutions to improve accuracy of diagnosis and treatment of hypertension (II).

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048371502

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15813975

DOI: 10.1186/1468-6708-6-6


Related references

Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, and Assessment of Risk of Pediatric Hypertension. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 32(5): 589-597, 2017

Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 32(5): 569-588, 2017

Blood pressure measurement and the guidelines: a proposed new algorithm for the diagnosis of hypertension. Blood Pressure Monitoring 9(6): 283-286, 2004

Blood Pressure Measurement and Hypertension Diagnosis in the 2017 US Guidelines: First Things First. Hypertension 71(6): 963-965, 2018

Hypertension : progress in diagnosis and treatment. Diagnosis and pathologic picture. Assessment criteria of hypertension. Measurement of blood pressure. Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi 79(1): 3-8, 1990

Hypertension Guidelines: Is It Time to Reappraise Blood Pressure Thresholds and Targets? Position Statement of the Latin American Society of Hypertension. Hypertension 68(2): 257-262, 2016

The measurement of adult blood pressure and management of hypertension before elective surgery: Joint Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland and the British Hypertension Society. Anaesthesia 71(3): 326-337, 2016

Central aortic blood pressure and management of hypertension: confirmation of a paradigm shift?. Hypertension 62(6): 1005-1007, 2014

The 2012 Canadian hypertension education program recommendations for the management of hypertension: blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, and therapy. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 28(3): 270-287, 2012

The 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part 1- blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 23(7): 529-538, 2007

The 2006 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part I--Blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 22(7): 573-581, 2006

The 2011 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, and therapy. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 27(4): 415-433.E1-2, 2011

The 2010 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part I - blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 26(5): 241-248, 2010

The 2008 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 1 - blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 24(6): 455-463, 2008

The 2013 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 29(5): 528-542, 2013