+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Cervical ripening and labor induction with 25 microg vs. 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol



Cervical ripening and labor induction with 25 microg vs. 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol



International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 90(3): 234-235




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048480781

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15913628

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.03.026


Related references

Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology 99(1): 145-151, 2002

Pre-induction cervical ripening with 25 microg and 50 microg vaginal misoprostol in 181 nulliparous parturients. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 22(3): 265-268, 2009

Oral misoprostol (100 microg) versus vaginal misoprostol (25 microg) in term labor induction: a randomized comparison. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 82(12): 1103-1106, 2003

A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 88(Suppl. 2): S56-S62, 2005

Comparison of 25 and 50 microg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction of cervical ripening and labor induction. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 53(1): 16-21, 2002

Labor induction at term: a comparison of the effects of 50 microg and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology 34(2): 102-105, 2007

Intravaginal misoprostol 600 microg and 800 microg for the treatment of early pregnancy failure. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 90(3): 208-212, 2005

A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 83(9): 1026-1034, 2000

No benefit, but increased harm from high dose (100 microg) misoprostol for induction of labour: a randomised trial of high vs. low (50 microg) dose misoprostol. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 22(6): 614-617, 2002

Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 92(1): 79-80, 2006

Labor induction with 25-microg misoprostol vaginal capsules. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 68(4): 272-275, 2009

Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 89(3): 263-267, 2005

Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 181(3): 626-629, 1999

Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 186(6): 1237-1243, 2002

Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: 25 vs. 50 microg dose regimen. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 72(1): 25-30, 2001