+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of propofol/fentanyl versus ketamine/midazolam for brief orthopedic procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department



Comparison of propofol/fentanyl versus ketamine/midazolam for brief orthopedic procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department



Pediatrics 112(1 Pt 1): 116-123



To compare the effectiveness of 2 medication regimens, propofol/fentanyl (P/F) and ketamine/midazolam (K/M), for brief orthopedic emergency department procedural sedation. This study was powered to compare recovery times (RT) and procedural distress as measured by the Observational Score of Behavioral Distress-revised (OSBD-r; range: 0-23.5 with 23.5 representing maximal distress). We conducted a prospective, partially-blinded controlled comparative trial comparing intravenous P/F with K/M in a convenience sample of 113 patients aged 3 to 18 years old undergoing orthopedic procedural sedation. All medications were administered by the intermittent intravenous bolus method. An independent sedation nurse recorded total sedation time and RT. Effectiveness was measured using 6 parameters: 1) patient distress as assessed by independent blinded observers after videotape review using the OSBD-r; 2) orthopedic satisfaction score (Likert scale 1-5); 3) sedation nurse satisfaction score (Likert 1-5); 4) parental perception of procedural pain using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale with the upper limit being "most pain"; 5) patient recall of the procedure; and 6) 1 to 3 week follow-up. RT and total sedation time were significantly less in the P/F group than in the K/M group (33.4 minutes vs 23.2 minutes). The mean OSBD-r scores during manipulation were 0.084 and 0.278 for the K/M and P/F groups, respectively. Although this difference was statistically significant (95% confidence interval for the mean difference -0.34 to -0.048), both regimens were successful in keeping the scores low. There was no statistical difference between the groups in the other measures of effectiveness. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in the occurrence of desaturation and late side effects. RT with P/F is shorter than with K/M. P/F is comparable to K/M in reducing procedural distress associated with painful orthopedic procedures in the pediatric emergency department. Although propofol has a greater potential of respiratory depression and airway obstruction as compared with ketamine, it offers some unique advantages including a quicker offset and smoother recovery profile.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048605043

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12837876

DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.1.116


Related references

Ketamine/propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial. Academic Emergency Medicine 18(8): 800-806, 2011

Ketamine/midazolam versus etomidate/fentanyl: procedural sedation for pediatric orthopedic reductions. Pediatric Emergency Care 26(6): 408-412, 2010

Procedural sedation and analgesia outcomes in children after discharge from the emergency department: ketamine versus fentanyl/midazolam. Annals of Emergency Medicine 54(2): 191-97.E1-4, 2009

Adverse Events During a Randomized Trial of Ketamine Versus Co-Administration of Ketamine and Propofol for Procedural Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Journal of Emergency Medicine 53(1): 1-9, 2017

Comparison of ketamine/propofol (ketofol) and etomidate/fentanyl (etofen) combinations for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: An observational study. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine 17(3): 89-94, 2017

Intravenous ketamine is as effective as midazolam/fentanyl for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Medical Journal of Malaysia 66(3): 231-233, 2011

Propofol versus midazolam/ketamine for procedural sedation in pediatric oncology. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 27(9): 471-476, 2005

Pediatric Procedural Sedation Using the Combination of Ketamine and Propofol Outside of the Emergency Department: A Report From the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 18(8): E356-E363, 2017

Retrospective Comparison of Intranasal Fentanyl and Inhaled Nitrous Oxide to Intravenous Ketamine and Midazolam for Painful Orthopedic Procedures in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatric Emergency Care 2019:, 2019

A randomized controlled trial of ketamine/propofol versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation. Annals of Emergency Medicine 57(5): 435-441, 2011

Ketamine-Propofol Versus Propofol Alone for Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Academic Emergency Medicine 22(9): 1003-1013, 2015

A clinical trial of propofol vs midazolam for procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine 6(10): 989-997, 1999

Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a randomized double-blind trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine 59(6): 504, 2012

The use of propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a comparison with midazolam. Emergency Medicine Journal 28(10): 861-865, 2011

A cost-effectiveness analysis of propofol versus midazolam for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine 15(1): 32-39, 2008