+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of the possum, P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems as predictors of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery



Comparison of the possum, P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems as predictors of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery



Anz Journal of Surgery 76(9): 812-816



Physiologic and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM), 'Portsmouth'-physiologic and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) and 'Colorectal'-physiologic and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (Cr-POSSUM) are three related scoring systems, which uses individual patient parameters to predict postoperative mortality. POSSUM overpredicts mortality in low-risk patients and underpredicts mortality in elderly and emergency patients. P-POSSUM was developed to compensate for these weaknesses. Cr-POSSUM was developed specifically for colorectal surgery. We aim to establish which of these scoring systems would be most useful in an Australasian context. Data were collected for 308 patients and predicted mortality risk values were generated using each of the three systems. The Mann-Whitney U-test was then carried out on the scores for each system. Receiver-operator characteristic curves were designed to determine the relative accuracy of each approach at discriminating between death and survival. All three POSSUM scoring systems showed a statistically significant ability to predict postoperative mortality. Additionally, in each system there was a significant difference in the raw physiologic and operative severity scores between survivors and those who died. A risk-stratification model was applied to each set of data, showing a correlation between an increase in risk and an increase in mortality rate. Finally, the receiver-operator characteristic curves generated showed that in this study group POSSUM, P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM were all satisfactory predictive tools although the latter tended to be relatively less accurate. Physiologic and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity, P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM are all reliable predictors of postoperative mortality in the Australasian context; although there was a trend towards POSSUM and P-POSSUM being better predictors than Cr-POSSUM. However, Cr-POSSUM requires fewer individual patient parameters to be calculated and is thus easier to generate. An ideal preoperative scoring system remains to be developed for predicting mortality in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048607160

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16922904

DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03875.x


Related references

A comparison of POSSUM, P-POSSUM and colorectal POSSUM for the prediction of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing colorectal resection. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 49(3): 330-335, 2006

Evaluation of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, o-POSSUM, and APACHE II scoring systems in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in gastric cancer patients. Asian Journal of Surgery 40(2): 89-94, 2017

Mortality rate prediction by Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM), Portsmouth POSSUM and Colorectal POSSUM and the development of new scoring systems in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. American Journal of Surgery 198(1): 31-38, 2009

Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. British Journal of Surgery 90(3): 340-345, 2003

Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgery (Br J Surg 2003; 90: 340-345). British Journal of Surgery 90(8): 1021; Author Reply 1021, 2003

POSSUM and P-POSSUM as predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: a meta-analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology 20(8): 2501-2510, 2013

Colorectal surgical mortality and morbidity in elderly patients: comparison of POSSUM, P-POSSUM, CR-POSSUM, and CR-BHOM. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 30(2): 173-179, 2015

Predictive value of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, cr-POSSUM, APACHE II and ACPGBI scoring systems in colorectal cancer resection. Journal of International Medical Research 39(4): 1464-1473, 2011

Operative mortality rates among surgeons: comparison of POSSUM and p-POSSUM scoring systems in gastrointestinal surgery. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 43(11): 1528-32 Discusssion 1532-4, 2000

Predicting Post-Operative Mortality in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Accuracy of Possum, P-Possum and Cr-Possum. Gastroenterology 138(5): S-853, 2010

Predicting post-operative mortality in patients undergoing colorectal surgery using P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM scores: a prospective study. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 24(12): 1459-1464, 2009

The applicability of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scores as predictors of morbidity and mortality in colorectal surgery. Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes 45(1): E1347, 2018

Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems for predicting the mortality in elective neurosurgical patients. British Journal of Neurosurgery 22(2): 275-278, 2008

Comparison of outcome of POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and cr-POSSUM scoring after elective resection of the sigmoid colon for carcinoma or complicated diverticular disease. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 42(7): 841-847, 2007

Can SAPS II predict operative mortality more accurately than POSSUM and P-POSSUM in patients with colorectal carcinoma undergoing resection?. World Journal of Surgery 32(4): 589-595, 2008