+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Orthopedic Clinics of North America 36(2): 187

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is an old orthopedic concept that has undergone a resurgence of interest in the past decade. Because of the rapid increase in the number of procedures being performed, previously recognized complications have begun to recur. This article focuses on complications that are related to the hip resurfacing procedure such as femoral neck fractures, avascular necrosis, raised metal ion levels, and sound initial and durable long-term fixation of an all-metal monoblock cobalt/chrome acetabular component. Dislocation rates after resurfacing and other complications are briefly discussed.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048613990

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15833456

DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.01.002

Related references

Complications of resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 13(4): 761-775, 1982

Patellar resurfacing complications in total knee arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics 38(2): 313-317, 2014

Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 75(5): 674-681, 1993

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 41(2): 263-272, 2010

Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty. Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007. Acta Orthopaedica 81(5): 535-541, 2010

Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: 8- to 10-year results. Journal of Arthroplasty 18(5): 541-545, 2003

Perceptions concerning hip resurfacing from attendees at the Second Annual U.S. Comprehensive Course on Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Bulletin of the Nyu Hospital for Joint Diseases 67(2): 102-107, 2009

Patellar resurfacing versus no resurfacing in Scorpio total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Knee Surgery 21(2): 97-100, 2008

Patellar resurfacing versus no resurfacing in two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty. Knee 20(6): 451-456, 2013

Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 91(10): 1287-1295, 2009

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 103(1): 54-59, 2014

Complications after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 42(2): 207, 2011

Current expert views on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Consensus of the 6th advanced Hip resurfacing course, Ghent, Belgium, May 2014. Hip International 26(1): 1-7, 2016

Resurfacing arthroplasty versus silicone arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis. Journal of Hand Surgery 32(6): 775-788, 2007

Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs. Acta Orthopaedica 79(6): 755-762, 2008