+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects



Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects



Memory and Cognition 32(7): 1170-1181



In two experiments, the identification of novel 3-D objects was worse for depth-rotated and mirror-reflected views, compared with the study view in an implicit affective preference memory task, as well as in an explicit recognition memory task. In Experiment 1, recognition was worse and preference was lower when depth-rotated views of an object were paired with an unstudied object relative to trials when the study view of that object was shown. There was a similar trend for mirror-reflected views. In Experiment 2, the study view of an object was both recognized and preferred above chance when it was paired with either depth-rotated or mirror-reflected views of that object. These results suggest that view-sensitive representations of objects mediate performance in implicit, as well as explicit, memory tasks. The findings do not support the claim that separate episodic and structural description representations underlie performance in implicit and explicit memory tasks, respectively.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 048736834

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15813498


Related references

Spacing mirror image repetition and memory for pictures. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10(4): 321-324, 1977

The effects of plane rotation on the recognition of brief masked pictures of familiar objects. Memory and Cognition 26(4): 791-803, 1998

Developmental changes in recognition memory for pictures of objects and scenes. Developmental Psychology 13(4): 337-341, 1977

Amnesics demonstrate spared recognition memory for single objects and impaired recognition memory for the relations among objects. Society for Neuroscience Abstract Viewer & Itinerary Planner : Abstract No 832 2, 2003

View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects. Perception & Psychophysics 60(6): 1052-1066, 1998

Stereoscopic depth: its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception 18(1): 55-68, 1989

Recognition memory for objects in very young children: the effect of shape and label similarity on preference for novel stimuli. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 29(2): 306-321, 1980

Detecting mirror image reversals of pictures in a mirror. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22(4): 285, 1984

Electrophysiological analysis of visual perceptive memory: Communication 2. Reflection of the method of standard image recognition in the P3 wave parameters. Fiziologiya Cheloveka 22(1): 40-45, 1996

Responses to mirror image stimulation and assessment of self-recognition in mirror- and peer-reared stumptail macaques. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. B, Comparative and Physiological Psychology 35: 201-212, 1983

Apparent depth of pictures reflected by a mirror: the plastic effect. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 74(7): 1522-1532, 2013

The worth of pictures: using high density event-related potentials to understand the memorial power of pictures and the dynamics of recognition memory. Neuroimage 35(1): 378-395, 2007

Mental rotation of letters, pictures, and three-dimensional objects in German dyslexic children. Child Neuropsychology 11(6): 497-512, 2005

Stereoscopy facilitates objects recognition in natural pictures. 2013

Rotation of objects in pictures viewed at an angle: evidence for different properties of two types of pictorial space. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 5(1): 78-87, 1979