+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a blinded comparative study using magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a blinded comparative study using magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 64(2): 219-223

We hypothesized that magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) may have less accuracy for the diagnosis and the assessment of the severity of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of both ERC and MRC in PSC. A case-control study. University Hospital. ERCs and MRCs of 36 patients with PSC and 51 controls (normal/other biliary tract diseases) were read in an independent, blinded, and random fashion by 2 magnetic resonance radiologists and 2 interventional endoscopists by using a previously validated classification system. Readers had no access to clinical history, laboratory results, or patient mix. Extrahepatic ductal (EHD) and intrahepatic ductal (IHD) visualization was excellent in 64% of 66% of MRCs and 86% of 74% of ERCs. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of PSC for readers 1 to 4 were 91% and 85%, 88% and 90%, 81% and 96%, and 83% and 96%. respectively. Receiver operating curve values were excellent for all readers (all >0.9). Interobserver agreement (kappa statistics) for the diagnosis of PSC (MRC, 0.83; ERC, 0.73) and for identifying the presence of IHD strictures (MRC, 0.64; ERC, 0.86) was good for both modalities, but only ERC (ERC, 0.55; MRC, 0.36) was good for the presence and the severity of EHD strictures. When assessment of disease severity was limited to the 36 patients with PSC, interobserver agreement was very poor for both MRC (0.23 and 0.07 for EHD and IHD, respectively) and ERC (0.24 and 0.34 for EHD and IHD, respectively). The retrospective case-control study made it difficult to assess the impact of the diagnosis on patient management. ERC and MRC were comparable for diagnosing PSC, with very good interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of PSC and IHD strictures. Only ERC had good agreement for EHD strictures. Interobserver agreement was very poor for both MRC and ERC when disease severity of PSC was assessed.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048775379

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16860072

DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.12.034

Related references

Magnetic resonance cholangiography vs endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis A blinded case controlled study. Gastroenterology 116(4 Part 2): A9, 1999

Co19 Blinded Comparative Study Of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography (Mrc) Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography (Erc) In The Diagnosis Of Sclerosing Cholangitis (Sc) In Children. Digestive and Liver Disease 44: S248-S249, 2012

Magnetic resonance cholangiography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 19(12): 1150-1154, 2014

Diagnosis of sclerosing cholangitis in children: blinded, comparative study of magnetic resonance versus endoscopic cholangiography. Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology 37(6): 596-601, 2013

Three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with respiratory triggering in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy 34(12): 984-990, 2002

Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: prospective comparison of MR cholangiography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Rofo 169(6): 622-626, 1999

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 4(4): 514-520, 2006

Sclerosing cholangitis with autoimmune pancreatitis versus primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, MR cholangiography, CT, and MRI. Acta Radiologica 54(6): 601-607, 2013

Comparison of 3D-IR-TSE-MR-cholangiography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the evaluation of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology 112(4 Suppl. ): A1400, 1997

The role of magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the evaluation of disease activity and severity in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Liver International 38(12): 2329-2339, 2018

Cholangiography by magnetic resonance for detection of cholelithiasis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, operative cholangiography and percutaneous cholangiography. Revista de Gastroenterologia del Peru 26(2): 115-124, 2006

Differential diagnosis of sclerosing cholangitis with autoimmune pancreatitis and periductal infiltrating cancer in the common bile duct at dynamic CT, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and MR cholangiography. European Radiology 22(11): 2502-2513, 2012

The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the diagnosis and management of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clinical Radiology 30(4): 445-450, 1979

Diagnostic workup of primary sclerosing cholangitis: the benefit of adding gadoxetic acid-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography to conventional T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography. Clinical Radiology 69(5): 499-508, 2014

Clinical importance of magnetic resonance cholangiography A comparative study to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Gastroenterology 110(4 Suppl. ): A457, 1996