+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Effects of systematic prone positioning in hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial



Effects of systematic prone positioning in hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial



JAMA 292(19): 2379-2387



A recent trial showed that placing patients with acute lung injury in the prone position did not increase survival; however, whether those results hold true for patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) is unclear. To determine whether prone positioning improves mortality in ARF patients. Prospective, unblinded, multicenter controlled trial of 791 ARF patients in 21 general intensive care units in France using concealed randomization conducted from December 14, 1998, through December 31, 2002. To be included, patients had to be at least 18 years, hemodynamically stable, receiving mechanical ventilation, and intubated and had to have a partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) ratio of 300 or less and no contraindications to lying prone. Patients were randomly assigned to prone position placement (n = 413), applied as early as possible for at least 8 hours per day on standard beds, or to supine position placement (n = 378). The primary end point was 28-day mortality; secondary end points were 90-day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and oxygenation. The 2 groups were comparable at randomization. The 28-day mortality rate was 32.4% for the prone group and 31.5% for the supine group (relative risk [RR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.19; P = .77). Ninety-day mortality for the prone group was 43.3% vs 42.2% for the supine group (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84-1.13; P = .74). The mean (SD) duration of mechanical ventilation was 13.7 (7.8) days for the prone group vs 14.1 (8.6) days for the supine group (P = .93) and the VAP incidence was 1.66 vs 2.14 episodes per 100-patients days of intubation, respectively (P = .045). The PaO2/FIO2 ratio was significantly higher in the prone group during the 28-day follow-up. However, pressure sores, selective intubation, and endotracheal tube obstruction incidences were higher in the prone group. This trial demonstrated no beneficial outcomes and some safety concerns associated with prone positioning. For patients with hypoxemic ARF, prone position placement may lower the incidence of VAP.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048915875

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15547166

DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.19.2379


Related references

Prone positioning in hypoxemic respiratory failure: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Critical Care 24(1): 89-100, 2009

Multicenter randomized controlled trial of the effects of inhaled nitric oxide therapy on gas exchange in children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Journal of Pediatrics 134(4): 406-412, April, 1999

The Role of Prone Positioning in the Management of Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure. Clinical Pulmonary Medicine 12(2): 128-129, 2005

4A randomized trial of prolonged prone positioning in children with acute respiratory failure. Chest 119(1): 211-218, 2001

Prone positioning in patients with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302(18): 1977-1984, 2009

Pressure support ventilation + sigh in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial, the PROTECTION trial. Trials 19(1): 460-460, 2018

Prone positioning improves oxygenation in spontaneously breathing nonintubated patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: A retrospective study. Journal of Critical Care 30(6): 1390-1394, 2016

A pilot, randomized, controlled clinical trial of lucinactant, a peptide-containing synthetic surfactant, in infants with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 13(6): 646-653, 2013

The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial. Critical Care 19(): 380-380, 2016

Multicenter randomized trial of the effects of inhaled nitric oxide therapy on gas exchange in children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Pediatric Research 43(4 PART 2): 35A, April, 1998

The efficacy of initial ventilation strategy for adult immunocompromised patients with severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial (VENIM). Bmc Pulmonary Medicine 17(1): 127-127, 2017

Effect of mechanical ventilation in the prone position on clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cmaj 178(9): 1153-1161, 2008

Prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Medicine 34(8): 1487-1491, 2008

A randomized, controlled study of the 1-hour and 24-hour effects of inhaled nitric oxide therapy in children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Chest 112(5): 1324-1331, 1997

Effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in children with acute lung injury: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294(2): 229-237, 2005