+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Estimating price elasticities when there is smuggling: the sensitivity of smoking to price in Canada

Estimating price elasticities when there is smuggling: the sensitivity of smoking to price in Canada

Journal of Health Economics 22(5): 821-842

A central parameter for evaluating tax policies is the price elasticity of demand for cigarettes. But in many countries this parameter is difficult to estimate reliably due to widespread smuggling, which significantly biases estimates using legal sales data. An excellent example is Canada, where widespread smuggling in the early 1990s, in response to large tax increases, biases upwards the response of legal cigarette sales to price. We surmount this problem through two approaches: excluding the provinces and years where smuggling was greatest; and using household level expenditure data on smoking. These two approaches yield a tightly estimated elasticity in the range of -0.45 to -0.47. We also show that the sensitivity of smoking to price is much larger among lower income Canadians. In the context of recent behavioral models of smoking, whereby higher taxes reduce unwanted smoking among price sensitive populations, this finding suggests that cigarette taxes may not be as regressive as previously suggested. Finally, we show that price increases on cigarettes do not increase, and may actually decrease, consumption of alcohol; as a result, smuggling of cigarettes may have raised consumption of alcohol as well.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048981727

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12946461

DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00058-4

Related references

Estimating own and cross brand price elasticities, and price-cost margin ratios using store-level daily scanner data. Agribusiness: an international journalmn 17(4): 515-525, 2001

Estimating the price elasticity of expenditure for prescription drugs in the presence of non-linear price schedules: an illustration from Quebec, Canada. Health Economics 14(9): 909-923, 2005

Empirical assessment of energy-price policies: the case for cross-price elasticities. Energy Policy 32(8): 989-1000, 2004

Estimating income and price elasticities for wine in Florida. Proceedings of the Florida Grape Conference7(17): 22-26, 1994

Alternative methods for estimating price elasticities of imports. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing 11(4): 21-31, 2000

Estimating price and income elasticities in the presence of age-cohort effects. Agribusiness New York 22(2): 201-217, 2006

Estimating Income and Price Elasticities of Trade in a Cointegration Framework. Review of International Economics 7(2): 254-264, 1999

Estimating income and price elasticities of imports and exports of Bangladesh. 1990

Sensitivity of price elasticity of demand to aggregation, unobserved heterogeneity, price trends, and price endogeneity: Evidence from U.S. Data. Energy Policy 97: 235-249, 2016

An elasticities approach to estimating excess demand in price-controlled markets. 1991

Price premium for high-efficiency refrigerators and calculation of price-elasticities for close-substitutes: a methodology using hedonic pricing and demand systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 19(17-18): 2075-2081, 2011

An approach to estimating supply and demand elasticities for the EEC and the welfare costs of price policies. Fm Economist, Oxford. 12: 2, 61-89, 1971

Estimating price elasticities of food trade functions: how relevant is the gravity approach?. 2007

Estimating price and income elasticities of demand for imports of forest products from panel data. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19(4): 358-373, 2004

Estimating Price Elasticities of Food Trade Functions How Relevant is the CES-based Gravity Approach?. Journal of Agricultural Economics 60(2): 253-272, 2009