+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies



Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies



Bmc Medical Research Methodology 6: 9



A quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies, named QUADAS, has recently been developed. Although QUADAS has been used in several systematic reviews, it has not been formally validated. The objective was to evaluate the validity and usefulness of QUADAS. Three reviewers independently rated the quality of 30 studies using QUADAS. We assessed the proportion of agreements between each reviewer and the final consensus rating. This was done for all QUADAS items combined and for each individual item. Twenty reviewers who had used QUADAS in their reviews completed a short structured questionnaire on their experience of QUADAS. Over all items, the agreements between each reviewer and the final consensus rating were 91%, 90% and 85%. The results for individual QUADAS items varied between 50% and 100% with a median value of 90%. Items related to uninterpretable test results and withdrawals led to the most disagreements. The feedback on the content of the tool was generally positive with only small numbers of reviewers reporting problems with coverage, ease of use, clarity of instructions and validity. Major modifications to the content of QUADAS itself are not necessary. The evaluation highlighted particular difficulties in scoring the items on uninterpretable results and withdrawals. Revised guidelines for scoring these items are proposed. It is essential that reviewers tailor guidelines for scoring items to their review, and ensure that all reviewers are clear on how to score studies. Reviewers should consider whether all QUADAS items are relevant to their review, and whether additional quality items should be assessed as part of their review.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048993071

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16519814

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-9


Related references

QUADOMICS: an adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of '-omics'-based technologies. Clinical Biochemistry 41(16-17): 1316-1325, 2008

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine 155(8): 529-536, 2011

Risk on bias assessment: (6) A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment on Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 39(4): 524-531, 2018

Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment. Academic Radiology 13(7): 803-810, 2006

Quality assessment of comparative diagnostic accuracy studies: our experience using a modified version of the QUADAS-2 tool. Research Synthesis Methods 4(3): 280-286, 2013

The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 3: 25, 2003

Methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies on non-invasive coronary CT angiography: influence of QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies included in systematic reviews) items on sensitivity and specificity. European Radiology 23(6): 1603-1622, 2013

Quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Included in Systematic Reviews). Rofo 182(11): 939-942, 2010

Quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: the development, use, and evaluation of QUADAS. Evidence-Based Medicine 11(6): 189-189, 2006

Creation and Critique of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Use of the STARD and QUADAS Methodological Quality Assessment Tools. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 15(2): 93, 2007

Quality and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in TB, HIV and malaria: evaluation using QUADAS and STARD standards. Plos one 4(11): E7753, 2009

QUADAS and STARD: evaluating the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Revista de Saude Publica 45(2): 416-422, 2011

Evaluation of the methodological quality of studies of the performance of diagnostic tests for bovine tuberculosis using QUADAS. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 153: 108-116, 2018

A systematic review of the PTSD Checklist's diagnostic accuracy studies using QUADAS. Psychological Trauma 7(5): 413-421, 2015

Validity of the QUADAS-2 in Assessing Risk of Bias in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Frontiers in Psychiatry 9: 221, 2018