+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of a medical emergency team one year after implementation



Evaluation of a medical emergency team one year after implementation



Resuscitation 61(3): 257-263



To evaluate the activity and impact of a Medical Emergency Team (MET) one year after implementation. A 700-bed District General Hospital (DGH) in Southeast England with approximately 53,500 adult admissions per annum. The population studied included all adult admissions receiving intervention by the MET during a 12-month period between 1 October 2000 and 30 September 2001. Analysis of the activation of the MET using both prospective and retrospectively acquired data. Routinely collected hospital data for admissions, discharges and deaths was used to compare outcomes for the 12 months before and after the introduction of the MET. There were 136 activations of MET over 1-year. Six cases were excluded. Mean age of patients was 73 years (range 20-97 years). 40% (52/130) survived to discharge following MET intervention. Of those who died 22% (28/130) were designated 'not for resuscitation'. Patients that died were more likely to have three or more physiological abnormalities present (odds ratio, OR 6.2, Chi-square (chi(2)) P = 0.004) and had higher MET scores (P = 0.004). Commonest interventions by the MET were initiation or increase of oxygen therapy or ventilatory support (80%), with or without the administration of intravenous fluids or medications. In 10% of cases, oxygen therapy was the sole intervention. One year after implementation of the MET a reduction in cardiac arrest rate and overall mortality was noted but this was not statistically significant. Often only simple interventions are only required to reverse deterioration. Initiating 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) decisions is a key part of MET activity. Multiple physiological abnormalities are associated with increased mortality and therefore wider and earlier application of the MET to the hospital population may save lives or expedite DNAR decisions. New systems need time to develop ("bed in") and further research is needed to observe significant reductions in cardiac arrests and overall mortality.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048993502

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15172703

DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.01.021


Related references

Early impact of medical emergency team implementation in a country with limited medical resources: a before-and-after study. Journal of Critical Care 26(4): 373-378, 2011

Interprofessional Learning - Development and Implementation of Joint Medical Emergency Team Trainings for Medical and Nursing Students at Universitätsmedizin Greifswald. Gms Journal for Medical Education 33(2): Doc32, 2016

Medical emergency team implementation: experiences of a mentor hospital. Medsurg Nursing 17(5): 312-6 323, 2008

Implementation and outcomes of a medical emergency team (MET) e-learning program. Resuscitation 93: E7, 2015

Prospective implementation of medical emergency team on a cardiothoracic unit. 2007

Association between implementation of an intensivist-led medical emergency team and mortality. Bmj Quality and Safety 21(2): 152-159, 2012

Routine Medical Emergency Team Assessments of Patients Discharged From the PICU: Description of a Medical Emergency Team Follow-Up Program. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 16(4): 359-365, 2015

The evolutionary process of Medical Emergency Team (MET) implementation: reduction in unanticipated ICU transfers. Resuscitation 49(2): 135-141, 2001

The effectiveness of implementation of the medical emergency team (MET) system and factors associated with use during the MERIT study. Critical Care and Resuscitation 9(2): 205-212, 2007

Measuring non-technical skills of medical emergency teams: an update on the validity and reliability of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Resuscitation 85(1): 31-33, 2014

Improving the non-technical skills of hospital medical emergency teams: The Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM™). Emergency Medicine Australasia 28(6): 641-646, 2016

Rating medical emergency teamwork performance: development of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Resuscitation 81(4): 446-452, 2010

Implementation of a medical emergency team in a large pediatric teaching hospital prevents respiratory and cardiopulmonary arrests outside the intensive care unit. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 8(3): 236-46; Quiz 247, 2007

Introduction of an obstetric-specific medical emergency team for obstetric crises: implementation and experience. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 198(4): 367.E1-7, 2007

Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram as a result of medical emergency team calls: a 5-year retrospective audit. Critical Care and Resuscitation 16(4): 280-284, 2014