+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of a personal and microenvironmental aerosol speciation sampler (PMASS)

Evaluation of a personal and microenvironmental aerosol speciation sampler (PMASS)

Research Report 2004(122): 1

In this study, an all-aluminum sampler was reconfigured to a lighter weight by using plastic for structural components not contacted by aerosol. Because the sampler body was made of plastic, the aluminum size-selective cyclone inlet was redesigned into a separate, removable unit. The resulting personal and microenvironmental aerosol speciation sampler (PMASS*) is a small, compact sampler designed for assaying concentrations of each major chemical constituent of particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 pm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) as well as its mass. The sampler consists of a miniature cyclone inlet and two parallel sampling channels, each of which may accommodate a denuder, particle filter, and backup filter. One channel serves to measure mass and inorganic ions; the other, organic and elemental carbon. Six of these samplers were first evaluated in the laboratory to verify the 50% cutpoint of the redesigned cyclone inlet near the target flow rate of 4.0 L/min and to test the effect of sampler orientation, aerosol type, and flow rate on the 50% cutpoint. The six samplers were fabricated at two different times with slight modifications in construction that yielded slightly different 50% cutpoints. The units were then evaluated as microenvironmental samplers under field conditions against reference samplers in Fresno, California, and Baltimore, Maryland. Testing in Maryland also included deployment as a personal sampler. In the laboratory, the mean (+/- SD) 50% cutpoint at a 4.1 L/min flow rate was 2.52 +/- 0.08 pm. Sampler orientation did not affect performance of the cyclone. Small differences in penetration efficiency were found with different challenge aerosols. For flow rates between 3.1 and 4.9 L/min, the 50% cutpoint varied from 3.3 pm to 2.1 pm, respectively. As a microenvironmental sampler, the PMASS performed well against relevant reference samplers for elemental carbon, organic carbon, and nitrate measurements but not for mass measurements, for which the PMASS showed a significant bias of -34%. Precision estimates for PMASS elemental carbon, organic carbon, nitrate, and mass, respectively, were 6.8%, 9.0%, 11.9%, and 12.7% in Fresno and 6.6%, 8.7%, 13.6%, and 17.5% in Baltimore. For personal sampling, PMASS measurements of mass again showed a significant bias of -24% compared with the reference sampler. Precision estimates for the PMASS as a personal sampler for elemental carbon, organic carbon, nitrate, and mass were 8.1%, 19.3%, 19.1% and 24.2%, respectively. Sulfate data were not analyzable because of the large magnitude and variability of the sulfate blanks. Field testing revealed some deformation of components of the PMASS filter pack. These problems may have affected the integrity of the particle filter.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 048993820

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15675716

Related references

Personal Exposure to PM 2.5 Black Carbon and Aerosol Oxidative Potential using an Automated Microenvironmental Aerosol Sampler (AMAS). Environmental Science and Technology 52(19): 11267-11275, 2018

Measuring personal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) among rural Honduran women: A field evaluation of the Ultrasonic Personal Aerosol Sampler (UPAS). Environment International 123: 50-53, 2019

Development and evaluation of an ultrasonic personal aerosol sampler. Indoor Air 27(2): 409-416, 2017

Airflow and Particle Velocities Near a Personal Aerosol Sampler with a Curved, Porous Aerosol Sampling Surface. Aerosol Science and Technology 28(3): 247-258, 1998

Diesel Exhaust/Mine Dust Virtual Impactor Personal Aerosol Sampler: Design, Calibration and Field Evaluation. Aerosol Science and Technology 22(2): 140-150, 1995

A personal particle speciation sampler. Research Report 2003(114): 1, 2003

Personal Aerosol Sampler Design: A Review. Applied Occupational and Enviromental Hygiene 13(5): 313-320, 1998

Evaluation of the use of an SKC button inhalable aerosol sampler with a Grimm aerosol monitor to determine air concentrations of subtilisin. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety 21(6): 4-13, 2014

Performance characteristics of the button personal inhalable aerosol sampler. Aihaj 61(3): 398-404, 2000

Numerical determination of personal aerosol sampler aspiration efficiency. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 18(4): 244-255, 2003

A Collaborative European Study Of Personal Inhalable Aerosol Sampler Performance. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 41(2): 135-153, 1997

A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol sampler performance. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 41(2): 135-153, 1997

Use of Numerical Calculations to Simulate the Sampling Efficiency Performance of a Personal Aerosol Sampler. Aerosol Science and Technology 39(7): 596-610, 2005

Performance of the RespiCon personal aerosol sampler in forest products industry workplaces. Aiha Journal 63(3): 311-316, 2002

A prototype personal aerosol sampler based on electrostatic precipitation and electrowetting-on-dielectric actuation of droplets. Journal of Aerosol Science 95: 43-53, 2016